New from NERA http://nera.myowg.com/6491.htm Copyright 2013, NERA en-us Sunday,14 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT http://nera.myowg.com/nera-images/rssNERAblue.jpg <![CDATA[ 2nd Annual GAR Live New York ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8125.htm NERA is pleased to sponsor Global Arbitration Review's second annual New York City conference, to be held on 18 September 2013. Experts from around the world will debate a range of timely topics, including US antitrust enforcement, antitrust policy, unresolved issues post-modernization, and the issues and challenges arising in global merger control.

NERA will host the post-event cocktail reception. To attend this event or to learn more, please visit the GAR website or contact Angela McLean at angela.mclean@nera.com.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 18 September 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Effective Use of Surveys in Trademark Litigation ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8134.htm NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Kent D. Van Liere will share his insights on the use of surveys in trademark litigation in a two-hour Knowledge Congress webcast on 6 August 2013. Surveys have been identified as significant tools in measuring the purchasing public's perception of trademarks and trade dress. Dr. Van Liere has testified on confusion, dilution, and secondary meaning with regard to trademarks and trade dress, most recently on behalf of Apple in Apple v. Samsung and on behalf of Frito-Lay in Frito-Lay v. Ralston Foods. The panel, which will also include John McKeown of Goldman, Sloan, Nash and Haber LLP, will discuss best practices and trends in the use of surveys in the courts.

Learn more and register for this webcast via The Knowledge Congress.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 6 August 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The Supreme Court's Decision in Amgen and Other Recent Securities Cases ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8141.htm This year, on the heels of its rulings in Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton (2011) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes (2011), the Supreme Court has issued several opinions affecting securities fraud litigation. Of particular note, Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds held that proof of materiality was not required at the class certification stage for an action based on the fraud on the market (FOTM) theory. On 24 July 2013, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. David Tabak will participate in a Securities Docket webcast that will examine this recent Supreme Court decision, along with Jordan Eth and Deanne E. Maynard, partners at Morrison & Foerster LLP. The panel will discuss the possible implications of four Supreme Court Justices suggesting a willingness to revisit whether the FOTM presumption of reliance is still proper, as revisiting this theory could have a dramatic effect on securities litigation. The panel also will discuss other recent Supreme Court cases and how they could affect parties in both private securities class actions and government enforcement actions.

Learn more and register for this webcast via the Securities Docket website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Securities Law: Fraud-on-the-Market Theory Demystified ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8138.htm On 23 July 2013, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. David Tabak will join a panel of experts for a two-hour Knowledge Congress webcast that will offer an in-depth analysis of the fraud-on-the-market doctrine (FOTM), which is virtually essential to class action plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. FOTM is based on the theory that, when a security is traded in an efficient market, all public information is reflected in the market price of the security, providing a rebuttable assumption that an investor who buys or sells at the market price has effectively relied upon all public statements. If a defendant can defeat FOTM's rebuttable presumption, it will typically defeat class certification and may effectively prevail on the case. The Supreme Court recently suggested it would be open to revisiting the wisdom behind FOTM.  Understanding FOTM and developments in economic theory will be critical for both shareholders and companies in future securities fraud cases.

During the webcast, the panel will discuss relevant economic theories and court decisions and offer substantive information regarding their implications on the presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases, as well as class certification proceedings and materiality. In addition, the panel will provide practical guidance to effectively use FOTM or counter its application in a securities fraud case. A live Q&A session will be included in this event.

Learn more and register for this event via The Knowledge Congress website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 23 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The Best of NERA 2013 ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8156.htm Four senior consultants from NERA's Securities and Finance Practice will participate in a live audio broadcast, to be hosted by the SEC Historical Society on 23 July 2013, examining current economic issues in financial regulation. Jorge Baez will discuss the effect of short sales on damages in securities class actions, Dr. Alan Grant will discuss insider trading, Erin McHugh will discuss contingent capital, and Timothy McKenna will discuss the Argentinian debt crisis. The tenth annual installment of the "Best of NERA" program will be moderated by Professor Reena Aggarwal of the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University.

Learn more and register for this audiocast via the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 23 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Economic Analysis of Business Disputes ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8147.htm NERA will host a seminar in Tokyo on 19 July 2013 that will examine recent experience with economic analyses in complex business disputes and litigation in Japan and the United States.

Economists from NERA's Japan and US offices will introduce the use of economic analysis in fields including antitrust, intellectual property, and securities and finance. In addition, Mr. Toshiaki Tada from Hibiya Sogo Law offices and Mr. Kohei Yoshimine from Tanabe & Partners will discuss the application of economic analysis in legal issues from a lawyer's point of view. We will provide simultaneous interpretation between Japanese and English. The program will conclude with a panel discussion to answer the questions raised by participants prior to the seminar. A reception will follow the discussion.

Program:

Survey Research in Business Disputes: From Intellectual Property and Antitrust to General Business Litigation
Naoya Kaneko, NERA Consultant, Tokyo

Patent Litigation in the United States
Dr. Alan Cox, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Intellectual Property Practice, San Francisco

An Economic Analysis of Securities Class Action Litigation in the US—–Trends after the Financial Crisis
Kisa Kiya, NERA Consultant, Tokyo

Economic Analysis of Damages Calculations: A Cross-sectional Approach
Hiroaki Ishigaki, NERA Vice President, Tokyo

The Application of Statistical and Economic Analysis in Litigation in Japan: Case Study and Points in Practice
Kohei Yoshimine, Lawyer, Tanabe & Partners

US Department of Justice (DOJ) Investigations of Foreign Cartels with Complex Supply Chains
Dr. Graeme Hunter, NERA Vice President, New York City

Antitrust Law Practice and Economic Analysis
Toshiaki Tada, Partner, Hibiya Sogo Law Offices

Learn more and register for this event.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 19 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ COMTO 42nd National Meeting and Training Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8116.htm The Conference of Minority Transportation Officials (COMTO), a non-profit national organization dedicated to enhancing participation in the transportation industry for minority individuals and businesses through advocacy, information sharing, training, education, and professional development, will hold its 42nd annual national meeting and training conference in Jacksonville, Florida on 13-17 July 2013. As part of the program, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Jon Wainwright, who specializes in analyzing the effects of discrimination, will deliver a presentation entitled "And We Are Not Saved: Empirical Evidence of Disparate Treatment Currently Impacting DBEs: Findings from NERA's Business Owner Surveys, 2005-2012." Dr. Wainwright will present a meta-analysis of NERA's business owner survey research conducted over the course of 16 individual disparity studies performed between 2005-2012.

Learn more via the COMTO website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Saturday, 13 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Webcast: Recent Trends in Bankruptcy Litigation ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8149.htm

During this webcast, a panel of experts examined recent bankruptcy case decisions and assessed their implications on financial and accounting analysis, as well as valuation. Among the cases the panel discussed were two recent decisions from bankruptcy courts in the influential Second (In re AMR Corp.) and Third (In re School Specialty, Inc.) Circuits that reviewed the issue of whether a lender extending credit to a company is entitled to a contractual "make-whole" premium when the borrowing company commences a bankruptcy proceeding and seeks to prepay its obligations. In the AMR opinion, Judge Lane held that certain prepetition financing transactions did not require payment of a "make-whole" premium where the obligations were accelerated due to the bankruptcy filing. The appeal was scheduled for oral argument but it will likely take some time for the Second Circuit to rule on the appeal. These two contrasting bankruptcy court decisions were examined to assess the relevance of make-whole premiums.

The panel also examined default rate interest (both pre- and post-payment), and whether agreements are enforceable as a matter of state law. Cases discussed on this topic included General Growth Properties in New York and the Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church bankruptcy matter in Boston. Finally, the panel addressed recent trends in valuation methodologies, the use of experts in bankruptcy litigation and what the courts' decisions regard fair market value and reasonable equivalent value questions. The panel discussed valuation decisions In re TOUSA, Inc. and In re Chemtura Corporation.

Speakers:

  • John Garvey, Senior Vice President, NERA Economic Consulting
  • Geraldine Ponto, Partner, BakerHostetler
  • Stephen Selbst, Partner and Chair, Bankruptcy Practice Group, Herrick, Feinstein LLP

Moderator:

  • Dr. Faten Sabry, Senior Vice President, NERA Economic Consulting

The webcast concluded with a Q&A session. To learn more, please visit the West LegalEdcenter website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Advises the Belgium Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications in Upcoming 4G Auction for 800 MHz Licenses ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8154.htm New York -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, has been appointed to support the Belgium Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications (BIPT) with its forthcoming award of spectrum licences in the 800 MHz band. These licences will be used to deliver next-generation (4G) mobile broadband services. NERA is supporting the BIPT in preparing materials for publication and providing electronic auction software to run the auction.

The 800 MHz spectrum band is being made available across Europe for roll-out of next-generation wireless broadband services. On 1 July, the BIPT published the Information Memorandum which details the terms associated with the licences, including incentives available to new mobile operators, and the auction format. A total of three licences are available, each consisting of 2x10 MHz of spectrum, available for a 20-year term. Each applicant may acquire at most one licence, at a minimum price of €120 million. The auction features relaxed coverage conditions for new operators, guaranteed national roaming for new operators, and an option to obtain additional spectrum in the 2.6 GHz band. The auction will use the simultaneous multiple-round ascending bid ("SMRA") format, similar to that used for previous awards of spectrum in Belgium and throughout Europe.

The BIPT invites all interested parties to apply to participate in the auction. The auction is open to any organization that fulfills the application requirements. Application information, key documents, and further information on the auction is available on the auction website, www.auction2013.be.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Professor Wei Tan Affiliates with NERA Economic Consulting ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8155.htm New York -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, announced today that Professor Wei Tan has affiliated with NERA's Antitrust and Competition Practice.

Dr. Tan is the Chair of the Economics Department in the Hanqing Advanced Institute of Economics and Finance at Renmin University of China. An experienced consultant, his areas of advisory and analytical services include industrial organization, applied econometrics, antitrust economics, merger analysis and consumer finance.

Previously, Dr. Tan was an Assistant Professor in the Economics Department at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He has also taught courses on mathematics at Johns Hopkins University, where he has held a graduate fellowship for five years. He has extensive consulting experience.

"We are thrilled that Wei has agreed to affiliate with NERA," said NERA President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "Wei's wealth of academic experience, particularly regarding the economics of antitrust, as well as his deep knowledge of industrial organization and econometrics, will greatly benefit NERA's clients worldwide. “

Dr. Tan has presented at international conferences and published widely on these topics in peer-reviewed international journals such as the Review of Industrial Organization, Eastern Economic Journal, Annals of Economics and Finance, and Competition Policy International.He has been the referee for leading international journals such as American Economic Review, Econometrica, and the RAND Journal of Economics. Dr. Tan holds a PhD in economics from Johns Hopkins University, an MA in economics from the University of Miami, and a BA in economics from Wuhan University. 

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation. NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 10 July 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Retrospective Analysis of Agency Determinations in Merger Transactions Symposium ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8157.htm This two-day symposium, held by the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law at The George Washington University Law School on 28-29 June 2013, brought together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to examine the use of retrospective studies to assess past enforcement decisions and improve merger control. The goal of the symposium was to identify lessons from previous studies, discuss state-of-the-art evaluation techniques, and consider how to move the measurement of merger policy quality from an emphasis on outputs to an assessment of outcomes. On the second day of the event, NERA Vice President Dr. Graeme Hunter joined a panel of experts from the European Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the University of Mannheim, and the University of East Anglia to discuss the existing literature.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 28 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Expert Witness 2013 ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8122.htm This Practising Law Institute (PLI) seminar, held in New York City and via live webcast on 27 June 2013, addressed how to effectively select, prepare, and use expert witnesses in complex litigation. NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Chudozie Okongwu participated in a panel discussion on expert reports and depositions. The panelists shared their insights on preparing effective expert reports, mastering witness preparation, and taking and defending expert depositions.

Learn more via the PLI website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 27 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The 8th Annual European Spectrum Management Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8117.htm NERA Economic Consulting again served as knowledge partner for Forum Europe's European Spectrum Management Conference, held in Brussels on 25-26 June 2013. In its role as knowledge partner, NERA advises on the agenda for the event and helps to identify expert speakers on spectrum management issues.

With more than 250 participants in 2012, the European Spectrum Management Conference has an established reputation as the leading event of the year for spectrum professionals throughout the region and beyond. As in previous years, the 2013 conference brought together representatives from all the major stakeholders for a detailed and interactive discussion on key issues and developments relating to spectrum management policy in Europe.

On the first day of the conference, NERA Vice President Richard Marsden chaired and moderated a discussion on spectrum licence renewals and pricing. Regulators going through a licence renewal process essentially have three options: reassign some or all of the spectrum to the current holder of that spectrum; reassign some or all of the spectrum to another category of users or a particular user through administrative action; or re-auction the spectrum, inviting both the current holder and other potential users to bid for the rights for future use. This session examined the positive and negative aspects of each of these three approaches, and how regulators can ensure they are respecting the rights of existing licence holders and other potential users while also maximising economic and societal benefits.

Learn more about the The 8th Annual European Spectrum Management Conference.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 25 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ CRRI 26th Annual Western Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8139.htm The Center for Research in Regulated Industries (CRRI) at Rutgers University held its annual Western conference in Monterey, California on 19-21 June 2013. Several members of NERA's Energy, Environment, and Network Industries Practice participated on Friday, 21 June. In a session on Rate Making, Vice President James Heidell presented a paper he co-authored with Senior Vice President Mike King entitled "Utility and Customer Economic Impacts of Net Metering for Distributed Renewables." Meanwhile, in a separate session on Utility Investment, Affiliated Academic Dr. Karl McDermott and Affiliated Consultant Dr. Carl Peterson presented "Testing Alternative Theories of Capital Structure: The Case of the Electric Utility Industry," and Senior Consultant Amparo Nieto presented "Transmission planning and pricing in the US -- What Else Can Be Done?"

Learn more via the CRRI website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 19 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) Joint Committee Meeting ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8148.htm The ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) Joint Committee held a  meeting in Cairns, Australia on 17-21 June 2013 to discuss, among other topics, the Regional Patent Examination Training (RPET) program, which uses e-learning technology to enable remote and real-time delivery of training to participants in different countries. The RPET curriculum is based on Australia's existing competency-based patent training program and focuses on search and examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In a section of the meeting devoted to competition law and regulatory settings across nations, NERA Affiliated Academic Dr. Lewis Evans, a professor of economics in the School of Economics and Finance at Victoria University of Wellington, delivered an invited presentation on the latest competition policy developments in New Zealand.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 17 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ High Court Brings Economics Back To Pay-For-Delay Analysis ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8137.htm In this guest column from Law360, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Sumanth Addanki and Vice Presidents Dr. Alan Daskin and Dr. Christine Siegwarth Meyer examine the US Supreme Court's much-anticipated decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc. et al. The Court ruled 5-3 that the analysis of so-called "reverse payment" settlements of Paragraph IV ANDA (abbreviated new drug application) litigation in the pharmaceutical industry should be carried out under the rule of reason. In doing so, the authors note, the Court resolved a circuit split, rejecting both the "scope of the patent" approach and the FTC's proposed presumption of illegality, putting the question squarely back in the realm of economics, where it belongs. Dr. Addanki, Dr. Daskin, and Dr. Meyer take comfort in the Court's focusing the analysis on an agreement's competitive effects and point out that such analysis requires comparing the settlement to the expected outcome of the litigation. Presumably, that would require some consideration of the merits of the underlying patent suit. However, the authors note, the Court's suggestion that the size of the payment is a workable surrogate for the patent's weakness has no economic basis. As the Dissent points out, the dollar value of the payment may reflect other considerations having nothing to do with the strength or weakness of the patent.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 17 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Dodd-Frank and the Future of Finance ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8123.htm The Center for the Study of Financial Regulation at the University of Notre Dame's Mendoza College of Business hosted their annual conference in Washington, DC on 13-14 June 2013. NERA sponsored this year’s conference, which focused on the impacts of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on the finance industry. NERA Vice President Dr. James Overdahl, a former Chief Economist at both the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the US Securities and Exchange Commission, moderated a panel discussion on banking reform. The panelists included Anil Kashyap, the Edward Eagle Brown Professor of Economics and Finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business; Anjan Thakor, Director of Doctoral Programs and John E. Simon Professor of Finance at the Washington University Olin Business School; and John Walsh, Former Comptroller of the Currency.

Learn more via the Center for the Study of Financial Regulation.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 13 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Announces Appointment of New Energy, Environment, and Network Industries Practice Chair ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8132.htm Washington, DC -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, announced today the appointment of Dr. Chantale LaCasse as Chair of the firm's Global Energy, Environment, and Network Industries (EEN) Practice.

Dr. LaCasse replaces Mike King, who has announced his retirement from NERA. Mr. King will remain with the firm as a Special Consultant.

"On behalf of all of us at NERA, I would like to thank Mike for his exceptional service to the firm as Practice Chair," said NERA President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "He has been instrumental in building the EEN Practice into the global leader it is today. I look forward to working with Chantale in continuing and building on Mike’s great work."

Dr. LaCasse has extensive experience in matters related to competition, regulation, and market design, and has played a central role in expanding NERA's Auctions Practice. She specializes in the design and implementation of auctions, procurement, and bidding processes. She provides advice to governments, regulatory agencies, and utilities, and has testified as an expert witness before state regulatory commissions and regulatory agencies. Dr. LaCasse has advised on all aspects of the design and implementation of competitive bidding processes, and has helped clients in a variety of areas, including capacity markets, renewable energy, solar generation projects, allocation of radio spectrum, and legal services. She has worked with clients around the world, including the United States, Canada, Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Singapore.

Before joining NERA in 2001, Dr. LaCasse was an established academic in Canada and conducted research in antitrust, auctions, and other issues in economic policy. She held the TD MacDonald Chair at the Canadian Competition Bureau. She holds a PhD and MA in economics from the University of Western Ontario, as well as a BA in mathematics and a BSocSc in economics from the University of Ottawa.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from over 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 13 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ 2013 BP Madrid Forum on Energy & Sustainability: The Future of Gas Markets in Europe ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8140.htm NERA Director Graham Shuttleworth was invited to speak about the long-term future of gas markets in Europe at this international forum, hosted by BP in conjunction with Comillas University in Madrid on 12-13 June 2013. Mr. Shuttleworth discussed the instability of the EU gas target model and the lessons that could be learned from the US model of gas pipeline regulation, which is more stable, he noted, because it better reflects the underlying economics of gas pipelines. He then explained how US regulatory institutions had managed to create a competitive pipeline industry by providing "open access to economies of scale" through the obligation to provide "taps" (the obligation for existing pipelines to connect other pipelines).

Mr. Shuttleworth's presentation is available for download here.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 12 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Hot Topics in International Dispute Resolution ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8098.htm This international conference, held in Prague on 12-14 June 2013, examined timely topics and developments in international dispute resolution arising out of cross-border business activities. On the last day of the conference, NERA Senior Vice President Mark Berenblut participated in a session entitled "Recognizing Differences in Presenting Expert Testimony at Trial." Mr. Berenblut, who is based in NERA's Toronto, London, and New York City offices, joined a panel of lawyers from the US and Europe to discuss and demonstrate the use and scope of permissible expert testimony, the manner in which examination takes place, and the role of the judge and counsel in conducting examination -- as it varies greatly between various European countries, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the US.

Learn more via the DRI International website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 12 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Marginal Cost Working Group Spring 2013 Meeting ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8093.htm Directed by NERA Senior Consultant Amparo Nieto, NERA's Marginal Cost Working Group (MCWG) gatherings create a unique forum for discussion, allowing rate managers and senior analysts of electric and gas utilities to exchange insights and information on their current activities and to keep pace with energy industry developments. Membership in MCWG is especially rewarding for industry professionals as they face the need to address energy efficiency goals and increase reliance on renewable energy resources. The MCWG convenes two times per year to share research and findings on new rate options, demand response initiatives, smart grid cost-benefit analysis, and many other emerging areas, such as pricing for energy storage capability. Since its inception in 1982, hundreds of utility staff members from dozens of companies have participated in the MCWG. Utilities considering joining the MCWG are welcome to attend an initial MCWG meeting as a guest.

For more information, please refer to the MCWG brochure, agenda, and registration form located in the right-hand column of this page.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 11 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Accounting and Finance Expert John Garvey Joins NERA Economic Consulting ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8126.htm Chicago -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, announced today that John Garvey has joined its Global Securities and Finance Practice as a Senior Vice President.

Mr. Garvey has testified on or directed complex litigation matters regarding fraud and forensic accounting, accounting restatements and financial statement reconstruction, securities fraud, accounting irregularities, merger and acquisition disputes, derivative disputes, professional liability, bankruptcy and solvency, business valuation, and general damages issues. He has represented numerous companies and individuals before regulatory bodies including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.  Prior to joining NERA, Mr. Garvey was a Managing Director in the Disputes and Investigations practice at Navigant Consulting. He is the former President of Chicago Partners, which was sold to Navigant in May 2008. Mr. Garvey also served as the Segment Leader of Navigant Economics from May 2008 through February 2012.

"John’s significant consulting and testimonial experience in complex accounting and board directed investigations adds a significant senior resource to NERA’s roster of experts. In addition, his background leading complex bankruptcy and accounting investigations makes him an invaluable addition to NERA's Securities and Finance Practice,” said Dr. Lawrence Wu, NERA's President. “He brings a wealth of practical expertise in the analysis of fraud and accounting irregularities that will be a tremendous asset to NERA's clients."

Mr. Garvey is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA). He is a member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He holds an MBA in finance from the University of Chicago, and a BB in accounting from Western Illinois University.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
 

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 10 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ 34th PURC/World Bank International Training Program on Utility Regulation and Strategy ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8062.htm On 18 June 2013 in Gainesville, Florida, NERA Special Consultant Dr. Hethie Parmesano led a one-day training session on electricity ratemaking and cost studies at this international training program, a collaboration between the World Bank and the Public Utility Research Center (PURC) at the University of Florida Warrington College of Business. Dr. Parmesano discussed the key elements of energy tariff design, including issues in setting class revenue requirements, marginal vs. embedded costs studies, efficient tariff structures, and innovative demand response tools. The session included a group tariff exercise with role-playing.

Learn more via the PURC website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 10 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Government Time Discounting and Required Rates of Return: UK History and Current Issues ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8130.htm The UK government first set financial objectives for the nationalized industries in 1961, and subsequently promoted the use of "discounted cash flow" for investment appraisal. The nationalized industry regime evolved until, in the 1990s, it was succeeded by economic regulation regimes for the privatized utilities. Meanwhile, discounting conventions emerged and have continued to evolve for wider government policy analysis, including aspects of climate change. In this article from Economic Affairs, NERA Affiliated Consultant Michael Spackman notes that issues about the size and functions of public expenditure notwithstanding, UK government conventions are currently fairly uncontroversial. However, he points out, in the world at large, government discounting remains subject to many academic and international controversies and misunderstandings.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 6 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ 3rd Annual AERE Summer Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8131.htm NERA Senior Consultant Dr. Sugandha Tuladhar presented "Environmental Policy for Fiscal Reform: Can a Carbon Tax Play an Important Role?" at the 3rd annual summer conference of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) in Banff, Alberta on 6-8 June 2013. The presentation examined how carbon tax revenue can be used to address the US debt problem, as well as the tradeoffs of various deficit reduction strategies including personal income tax and corporate income tax swaps.

Please feel free to request a copy of Dr. Tuladhar's presentation via the link below.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 6 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Back to the Future: Unilateral Effects -- Not Just for Differentiated Products Anymore? ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8075.htm In recent years, unilateral effects in antitrust merger analysis have come to be associated with differentiated goods marketplaces ("Is Brand A the closest substitute for Brand B?"). But is the tide turning, so that unilateral effects will begin to reappear in agency reviews of mergers in relatively homogenous goods markets?
 
The distinguished panelists examined why coordination has been viewed as the appropriate theory of harm in such markets, and discussed how to model rigorously the antitrust economics of unilateral effects in such markets. The panel also looked at a case study that illustrates how these economic principles can be applied, and motivated a spirited discussion of what the antitrust analysis of mergers in such markets may look like as we go back to the future.

Moderator:

Dr. Lawrence Wu, President, NERA Economic Consulting

Speakers:

Dr. Chetan Sanghvi, Senior Vice President, NERA Economic Consulting; former Economics  Advisor to the Office of Commissioner Brill, Federal Trade Commission
Chetan Sanghvi recently rejoined NERA from the Federal Trade Commission, where he served as the Commission's expert economist in matters on a litigation track and was an economics advisor to the office of Commissioner Brill. While at the FTC, he also was the lead economist on an inter-agency Presidential task force on pricing and competition in the oil industry, and provided technical aid and training to the Competition Commission of India. His work covered numerous industries, including health care, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, search engines and the Internet, consumer and industrial products, entertainment, and retail services. Previously, he held senior positions at several economic consulting firms, and was an economist within the FTC's Bureau of Economics.

Darren Tucker, Senior Competition Advisor to Commissioner Joshua D. Wright, Federal Trade Commission; Partner, Bingham McCutchen LLP (effective 1 July)
Darren Tucker is senior competition adviser to FTC Commissioner Joshua D. Wright and previously served as the senior competition adviser to former FTC Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch. In that role, Mr. Tucker reviews and analyzes staff recommendations on all aspects of the FTC’s competition mission. Mr. Tucker was the principal drafter of the agency’s liability decision in In the Matter of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners and the closing statement for ESI/Medco. He also helped develop the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines and the FTC’s antitrust enforcement statement governing accountable-care organizations that service Medicare patients under the Affordable Care Act. Mr. Tucker will be joining Bingham McCutchen as a partner on 1 July.

Michael Weiner, Partner and Co-Chair, Antitrust/Competition Group, Dechert LLP
Michael Weiner is co-chair of Dechert's antitrust/competition group. He provides strategic advice, resolves government investigations, and effectively litigates for clients with antitrust issues in a broad range of industries. He is a frequent speaker and author on a wide range of antitrust/competition issues, and currently serves on the editorial board of World Competition Law and Economics Review. He is also the former editorial chair of Antitrust magazine, as well as a former Council Member and Officer of the ABA's Antitrust Section. Mr. Weiner has been named a national and New York "litigation star" in Benchmark Litigation, "recommended" in Legal 500, and listed in Chambers Global, Who's Who Legal, International Who's Who of Competition Lawyers, and Global Counsel Handbooks' Competition Law, as well as in The Best Lawyers in America.

To learn more, please contact Angela McLean at angela.mclean@nera.com.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 5 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ North American Transfer Pricing Conference & Primer ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8133.htm Bloomberg BNA and Baker & McKenzie LLP hosted a conference and interactive workshop in Washington, DC on 5-6 June 2013 that examined the key transfer pricing issues impacting both US and foreign taxpayers. On the second day of the conference, NERA Vice President Dr. Vladimir Starkov participated in a panel discussion entitled "Challenges of Operating in the BRIC Countries." The panelists addressed the challenges of operating in Brazil, where conflicts arise due to the country's unique formulary approach to transfer pricing; Russia, which introduced comprehensive transfer pricing rules as recently as 2011; India, known for aggressive auditors and copious litigation; and China, where both taxpayers and the State Administration of Taxation must contend with the local tax bureaus and resource constraints.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 5 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Snapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation: 2013 Update ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8120.htm In their annual review of recent trends in filings and settlements in asbestos litigation, NERA Vice President Mary Elizabeth Stern and Senior Vice President Lucy P. Allen use publicly available data to analyze trends in asbestos-related liabilities for more than 150 companies.

The authors find that the asbestos liabilities of solvent firms were relatively unchanged in 2012 compared to 2011. In last year's update, the authors reported that average dollars per resolved claim had increased dramatically, rising 75% relative to the average cost of a resolved claim in 2010. But NERA's analysis attributed the increase to a changing disease mix of the resolved claims, rather than an increase in firms' asbestos liabilities.

The results observed over the past year are consistent with NERA's conclusions from the 2011 data, indicating a sustained shift in the disease mix rather than a worsening of firms' total liabilities. In 2012, average dollars per resolved claim continued to remain high, but the higher average settlement costs have not led to higher total settlement payments or increased filings. Reserves have also remained at levels established since approximately 2004.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 3 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ An Econometric Assessment of Telecommunications Prices and Consumer Surplus in Mexico Using Panel Data ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8079.htm In this article from the Journal of Regulatory Economics, NERA Vice President Dr. Agustin J. Ros and Jerry A. Hausman, the John and Jennie S. MacDonald Professor of Economics at MIT, analyze telecommunications prices in Mexico by using a panel data of countries similar to Mexico to estimate demand models for mobile and fixed-line telecommunications. The authors find that Mexico's actual mobile and fixed-line prices are below the predicted prices based on similar countries' prices. Furthermore, Mexican consumers are paying lower prices than what one would expect based on comparisons of comparable countries. Dr. Ros and Professor Hausman calculate that, in 2011, Mexican consumers received at least $4–5 billion (USD) in consumer surplus from these lower mobile prices and, in 2010, they received over $1 billion (USD) in consumer surplus from these lower fixed-line prices. These findings are in contrast to the general perception that concentrated telecommunications markets in Mexico are resulting in high prices and harming consumers.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Saturday, 1 June 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Hot Documents in Merger Investigations ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8086.htm This panel discussion, hosted by the ABA Section of Antitrust Law in Washington, DC on 29 May 2013, provided an overview on "hot documents," a term that was defined in this year's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) horizontal data report. The FTC's report also provided empirical data on how the presence or absence of hot documents have impacted merger investigations. NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Chetan Sanghvi, who formerly served as an Economics Advisor at the FTC, participate in the discussion along with Cathy Moscatelli, Assistant Director at the FTC, and Jim Tierney, Section Chief of the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. The panelists began by defining hot documents, and then discussed the best practices for preventing them, how to deal with them from a government and defense perspective, and the interplay between hot documents and economic analysis. Mike Cowie, Partner at Dechert LLP, moderated the discussion.

Learn more via the ABA.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ IP Strategy Summit: Enforcement ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8118.htm This conference, held in Washington, DC on 29-30 May 2013, discussed trends in intellectual property enforcement strategies by operating companies, universities, and patent assertion entities (PAEs). NERA Vice President Dr. David Blackburn moderated a panel entitled "Standard Essential Patents (SEPS) and Your Enforcement Strategy." The panel members included Paul Michel, the retired Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit, Dr. Alan Cox, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Intellectual Property Practice, and Laura Beth Miller, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lion LLP. The panelists discussed the current SEPs landscape in light of recent disputes among smartphone technology owners, the recent RAND decision in the Microsoft v. Motorola case, and trends in both federal courts and the US International Trade Commission.  Dr. Cox also participated on a panel entitled "International Enforcement: Globalization and Your IP," which covered intellectual property enforcement issues in China, India, and Europe.

NERA is a sponsor of IP Strategy Summit: Enforcement.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ CRRI 21st Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8121.htm At a time of significant change in the postal industry, experts from around the world came together in Dublin on 29 May - 1 June 2013 for the annual postal and delivery economics conference hosted by the Center for Research in Regulated Industries (CRRI) at Rutgers University. Sessions covered a wide range of topics, including the cost and financing of universal service, innovation in the industry, the growth of the parcels market, pricing, and the efficiency of postal operators. 

As part of the conference, NERA Consultant Helen Smith presented a paper on access pricing challenges in postal markets. The paper explains why postal regulators face a unique set of challenges in regulating access prices, and discusses whether there is anything that regulators can learn from experiences in other industries, including water and telecommunications. In addition, Associate Director Stuart Holder acted as a discussant in a session on the universal service obligation (USO), which included papers on applying a cost-benefit approach to specifying the USO in the UK, and alternative USO financing mechanisms for the US postal market.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Quantifying Benefits and Costs under the Resource Management Act: Lessons from Commerce Commission Decision-Making ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8113.htm Section 32 of New Zealand's Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) requires an evaluation of benefits and costs before certain proposals, such as local or regional plans, are prepared by resource management decision-makers. To date there has been no requirement for those benefits and costs to be quantified; however, that would change if proposed amendments to section 32 are passed into legislation. The Resource Management Reform Bill would, among other changes, amend section 32 to require the decision-maker to, "if practicable," quantify the benefits and costs of the effects anticipated from the proposal being evaluated. While some have expressed concerns that the complexity of quantifying benefits and costs will limit the use of quantification in section 32 evaluations, this NERA paper points out that there already is another high-stakes decision-making regime in New Zealand involving quantification of benefits and costs to the degree practicable -- the regime operated by the Commerce Commission under the Commerce Act 1986. Authors James Mellsop and Kevin Counsell argue that the proposed amendments to section 32 of the RMA, if they are implemented, will increase the rigor and objectivity of RMA decision-making. Although the changes might increase complexity, the Commerce Commission's approach provides comfort that the quantification of benefits and costs can be achieved in a manner that is transparent, robust, and tractable. This paper outlines how the Commerce Commission's approach to quantification works, and explores the implications for section 32 of the RMA.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Manage Experts, Capitalize Expertise, Value Intellectual Capital ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8078.htm NERA Associate Director Jean-Sébastien Lénik delivered a presentation at a conference hosted by the National Association for Interdisciplinary Research on Valuation in Paris on 22 May 2013. His presentation focused on essential processes to map intellectual capital (IC) within organizations. Mr. Lénik also provided key insights on IC-related valuation techniques.
 
Learn more via the ANVIE website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Back to the Future: Unilateral Effects -- Not Just for Differentiated Products Anymore? ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8074.htm In recent years, unilateral effects in antitrust merger analysis have come to be associated with differentiated goods marketplaces ("Is Brand A the closest substitute for Brand B?"). But is the tide turning, so that unilateral effects will begin to reappear in agency reviews of mergers in relatively homogenous goods markets?
 
The distinguished panelists examined why coordination has been viewed as the appropriate theory of harm in such markets, and discussed how to model rigorously the antitrust economics of unilateral effects in such markets. The panel also looked at a case study that illustrates how these economic principles can be applied, and held a spirited discussion of what the antitrust analysis of mergers in such markets may look like as we go back to the future.

Moderator:

Dr. Lawrence Wu, President, NERA Economic Consulting

Speakers:

William Kolasky, Partner, WilmerHale LLP; former  Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division, US Department of Justice
William Kolasky is a partner in WilmerHale’s Regulatory and Government Affairs Department, and a former chair of the firm's Antitrust and Competition Practice Group. Mr. Kolasky has been practicing antitrust law in Washington, DC for over 35 years and served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. While at Justice, he was one of the architects of the International Competition Network, a network of over 100 competition authorities worldwide designed to promote great international cooperation and convergence among those authorities. He is the most recent recipient of Global Competition Review's Lifetime Achievement Award.

Dr. Chetan Sanghvi, Senior Vice President, NERA Economic Consulting; former Economics  Advisor to the Office of Commissioner Brill, Federal Trade Commission
Chetan Sanghvi recently rejoined NERA from the Federal Trade Commission, where he served as the Commission's expert economist in matters on a litigation track and was an economics advisor to the office of Commissioner Brill. While at the FTC, he also was the lead economist on an inter-agency Presidential task force on pricing and competition in the oil industry, and provided technical aid and training to the Competition Commission of India. His work covered numerous industries, including health care, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, search engines and the Internet, consumer and industrial products, entertainment, and retail services. Previously, he held senior positions at several economic consulting firms, and was an economist within the FTC’s Bureau of Economics.

Darren Tucker, Senior Competition Advisor to Commissioner Joshua D. Wright, Federal Trade Commission; Partner, Bingham McCutchen LLP (effective 1 July)
Darren Tucker is senior competition adviser to FTC Commissioner Joshua D. Wright and previously served as the senior competition adviser to former FTC Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch. In that role, Mr. Tucker reviews and analyzes staff recommendations on all aspects of the FTC’s competition mission. Mr. Tucker was the principal drafter of the agency’s liability decision in In the Matter of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners and the closing statement for ESI/Medco. He also helped develop the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines and the FTC’s antitrust enforcement statement governing accountable-care organizations that service Medicare patients under the Affordable Care Act. Mr. Tucker will be joining Bingham McCutchen as a partner on 1 July.

To learn more, please contact Angela McLean at angela.mclean@nera.com.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The Demand for Mobile Services in Colombia and the Impact of Asymmetric Mobile Regulation ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8111.htm In 2009, the Colombian telecommunications regulator -- Comisión de Regulación de Comunicaciones (CRC) -- declared Colombian mobile operator Comcel a dominant operator. As a result, the CRC imposed asymmetric regulation on Comcel by establishing a retail price cap for its off-net voice calls. In practice, this forced Comcel to rebalance its retail rates by lowering its off-net prices and/or increasing its on-net prices. In this article, first published in Info, NERA Vice President Dr. Agustin Ros and Senior Analyst Douglas Umaña examine the economic and consumer impact of the CRC's 2009 dominance regulation. The authors estimate a demand model of the Colombian mobile market during the period 2005–2011 using publicly available data. The article begins with a description of the Colombian mobile market since the late 1990s, followed by a discussion on the hypothesized effects of asymmetric regulation on mobile markets. The authors conclude with an empirical analysis of demand for mobile services in Colombia and find that the asymmetric regulation cost consumers approximately $100 million USD.

This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (http://www.nera.com/67_8111.htm). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited (www.emeraldinsight.com).

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ PANC 2013 Annual Seminar ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8108.htm The Power Association of Northern California (PANC) held its annual spring seminar in San Francisco on 21 May 2013. NERA Senior Vice President Dr. W. David Montgomery joined a panel discussion on natural gas, which addressed the supply side market outlook for natural gas in North America; the process of a controversial drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking;" LNG exports; and health concerns with natural gas and impacts on fracturing to the environment. In addition, Dr. Elizabeth M. Bailey, Adjunct Professor at the U.C. Berkeley-Haas School of Business and Special Consultant to NERA, participated in a panel discussion on cap-and-trade emissions trading. The panelists discussed the impact that cap-and-trade will have on California's energy markets, power market operations, and contracts, including how restrictions on resource shuffling and holding limits, among other issues, may impact compliance.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ 2nd Annual White Collar Crime Institute ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8029.htm NERA was pleased to sponsor the New York City Bar's 2nd Annual White Collar Crime Institute, held on 20 May 2013.

White collar criminal prosecutions continue to dominate the legal landscape and the headlines. The White Collar Criminal Law Committee assembled a comprehensive full-day program that explored critical developments that have characterized this new era of white collar enforcement. Keynote speakers included Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Manhattan District Attorney, and Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Panels included senior government enforcement officials, judges, academics, general counsel of leading New York-based corporations and financial institutions, and top practitioners in the field.

Learn more via the New York City Bar website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Pretrial Practice 2013 ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8087.htm As fewer civil cases are tried, the staples of pretrial practice -- pleadings, motions to dismiss, discovery, Daubert motions, summary judgment, and settlement -- have replaced trials as the focus of litigation. This Practising Law Institute seminar, held in New York City and via live webcast on 20 May 2013, examined how the changing nature of pretrial practice will affect the future of litigation. NERA Senior Vice President Lucy P. Allen, who is frequently retained to testify as an expert witness, participated in a panel discussion on the use of experts, along with the Hon. Holly B. Fitzsimmons, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, District of Connecticut; John Halebian, Partner, Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP; and Jeffrey T. Scott, Partner, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Ms. Allen and her co-panelists discussed when to retain experts, testifying vs. consulting experts, protecting expert communications, preparing expert reports, taking discovery of experts, and Daubert motions.

Learn more via the PLI website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Third Annual Western Energy Leadership Summit ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8096.htm This summit, held in Keystone, Colorado on 19-21 May 2013, focused primarily on energy and electricity opportunities and challenges for the western US and Canada. On 20 May, Mike King, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Energy, Environment, and Network Industries Practice, participated in a session entitled "Is it Time to Rethink the Future of the Electric Power Sector?" Mr. King and his co-panelists discussed how to balance the objectives of satisfying the increasing demand for electricity in certain load centers while reducing greenhouse gases, and whether the use of distributed energy will make the US less vulnerable to energy security issues.

Learn more via the Ener4orum website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Sunday, 19 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The 11th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8046.htm NERA was pleased to sponsor this year's Industrial Organization Society annual conference, held in Boston on 17-19 May 2013. The IOS promotes research on antitrust policy, regulatory policy, and competition and market power in real-world markets.

Carl Shapiro, the Transamerica Professor of Business Strategy in the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley, served as keynote speaker. Dr. Shapiro served as a Member of the President's Council of Economic Advisers during 2011-12. For the two years immediately prior to that, he was the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Economics at the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice; he also held that position during 1995-96.

Learn more via the IOS website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ AAPOR 68th Annual Conference ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8112.htm NERA Senior Consultant Dr. Melissa Pittaoulis delivered a presentation at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), held in Boston on 16-19 May 2013. Her presentation, "Designing and Defending Surveys Used in Commercial Litigation," addressed the importance of survey evidence in commercial litigation, particularly in intellectual property disputes. Dr. Pittaoulis discussed the various challenges of conducting litigation surveys, as well as effective approaches to overcoming these challenges.

Learn more via the AAPOR website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Webcast: A Discussion of Current Developments Relating to Preferences and Fraudulent Conveyances in Bankruptcy Cases ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8084.htm Under section 547(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, a trustee can avoid and recover a transfer as a preference by satisfying various requirements. Once a trustee proves all of the elements of a preference, there are affirmative defenses that can reduce a creditor's potential preference exposure. This Knowledge Congress webcast, held on 15 May 2013, featured a distinguished panel of experts who provided a comprehensive overview of preferences along with the defenses to a preference. NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Faten Sabry discussed how courts have reacted to valuation opinions in recent fraudulent conveyance and other bankruptcy matters. Dr. Sabry provided an overview of the valuation issues in a number of recent cases, including VFB v. Campbell, Iridium, Lehman Brothers, Chemtura, and Verizon (Idearc). She then shared examples of the economic analysis of equity, bond prices, and credit default swaps in assessing solvency; discussed what the financial analysis of bond prices and credit default swaps can and cannot tell us about solvency; and examined foreseeability issues with applications in bankruptcy cases.

Learn more via The Knowledge Congress website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Finding the GAAP in FCPA Enforcement: Challenges in Identifying the Impact of Alleged Bribery in Financial Statements ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8106.htm Since a ramp-up in enforcement actions over the past decade, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled an average of 10 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)-related cases on an annual basis from 2007-2012, with settlement amounts averaging just under $29 million. Previous research in this area has noted that the economic impact of FCPA enforcement actions can extend beyond the immediate settlement amounts. In this NERA paper, Senior Consultant Raymund Wong and Special Consultant Dr. Jerry Arnold point out that, even in FCPA enforcement actions in which the fines, penalties, and/or lost business can be substantial, there is not necessarily a restatement or asset impairment involved. The authors note that, despite pairing the illegality of the act of bribing a foreign official with accounting provisions in the FCPA, the financial statement impact of FCPA enforcement, to date, generally has focused on recognition of settlements with the SEC and/or Department of Justice as an expense recorded at the time of settlement. This paper explores the potential reasons for this potentially limited impact on financial statements.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ A Cross-Sector and Cross-Country Review of Approaches to Transitioning to Markets ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8142.htm Faced with increased risk of drought, increased climate volatility, and demand pressures due to population growth, the Environment Agency (EA) has been working with other government bodies and regulators to reform the framework in England and Wales for how water is taken from different sources ("water abstraction"). Although the current system allows trading of the right to abstract water, trading is difficult and rarely occurs. The EA has been exploring more market-based approaches to water abstraction management, but some stakeholders (including water users and license holders) have raised concerns about the impacts of possible reforms designed to make trading easier. Concerns expressed by stakeholders include the potential for the water abstraction market to be dominated by large users, and the potential role of non-users (i.e., those that do not abstract themselves) and their effects on users.

Within this context, the EA commissioned NERA to review the experience of transitions to market-based approaches in selected other sectors and countries. The review took the form of case studies, covering a wide range of experiences, such as tradable quotas in fisheries, airport slots trading, emissions trading, trading of gas transport capacity rights, and measures to improve liquidity in markets. NERA’s analysis identifies key factors affecting the success of newly created markets in other sectors. Our review also shows that the concerns expressed by water abstraction stakeholders are not unique, and that mitigating provisions have been used in other sectors to address these. Some lessons for water abstraction include:

  • Clarity in the definition and application of rights is an important prerequisite for the successful transition to a market-based approach. A flexible approach to defining rights can reduce the risk of potentially costly regulatory interventions in situations where there is uncertainty about the availability of the resource for which a market is created. In water abstraction, a flexible approach can consist of defining entitlements as proportions of the water available in a catchment, and periodically setting the overall quantity available to abstract to reflect changes to the scarcity of the water resource.
  • The way in which rights are allocated can differ across users to reflect their circumstances -- for example, the ability to pass through abstraction costs to others. Moreover, the allocation of rights can also be used as a means to facilitate liquidity in markets -- for example, obligations can be placed on large abstractors to offer a proportion of their allocations for sale, or entitlements can be time-limited and require periodic renewal.
  • In addition to the allocation mechanism, various other measures can be used in water abstraction to improve market liquidity. Measures used elsewhere include: standardizing products; setting up trading platforms to compliment other means of trading; and provisions for flexibility in trading, so that in cases where the requirements of buyers do not exactly match the rights available for sale, a coordinating body can alter the terms of the trade without a full regulatory investigation.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ RAND Determined? Judge Robart's Decision in Microsoft v. Google/Motorola ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8090.htm This webinar examined the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued by Judge James Robart of the Western District of Washington in Microsoft v. Motorola. This order marked the first time that a US court has made a detailed determination of reasonable and nondiscriminatory ("RAND") licensing terms for portfolios of standard-essential patents (SEP) that the SEP owner committed to license on RAND terms. The opinion presented a legal framework for resolving RAND disputes and provides rulings on the value of SEPs where a RAND commitment exists. NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Alan Cox, who chairs the firm's Intellectual Property (IP) Practice, was invited to discuss these issues with William Coats, an IP litigator at Greenberg Traurig; and Marc Sandy Block, staff counsel at IBM Corporation's IP Law headquarters. Starting with the traditional 15 factors outlined in Georgia-Pacific for setting a reasonable royalty, Judge Robart modified nine and discarded three to fit the context of SEPs and RAND licensing. His analysis concluded that SEPs should be valued in light of the incremental contribution of the patented technology to the capabilities of the standard, and the contribution of those technical capabilities to the licensee and its products. The panelists described, analyzed, and assessed Judge Robart's opinion.

Learn more via the IPO website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 9 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Effective Responses to Patent Trolls: We Can Cross That Bridge ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8064.htm NERA and Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP co-sponsored a luncheon in East Palo Alto on 8 May 2013 to discuss effective responses to patent infringement claims and threats of such claims from patent assertion entities -- also known as patent trolls. The program provided insights on both patent law and antitrust law responses to patent troll practices -- including discussion of challenges to portfolio acquisitions from operating companies that retain roles in subsequent enforcement actions against their rivals, proposed United States Patent and Trademark Office actions, and potential legislative solutions. Dr. Alan Cox, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Intellectual Property Practice, participated in the discussion. Other speakers included:
  • Cynthia Bright, Associate General Counsel, IP Litigation & Public Policy, Hewlett-Packard Company
  • Michelle Lee, Director, USPTO Silicon Valley Office
  • Fiona Scott Morton, Professor, Yale School of Management and former Chief Economist of the Antitrust Division, US Department of Justice
  • Robert Skitol, Partner, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 8 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Spring 2013 Marsh & McLennan/NERA Economic Consulting Lecture Series on Current Economic Events: Predicting the Present with Search Engine Data ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8061.htm NERA Economic Consulting and its parent company, Marsh & McLennan Companies, are co-sponsoring a series of lectures on current economic events organized by The George Washington University's Department of Economics. The sponsorship of the lecture series showcases Marsh & McLennan Companies and NERA's commitment to highlighting the importance and impact of economics in business and regulatory environments.

This event, "Predicting the Present with Search Engine Data," took place 8 May 2013 in Washington, DC, and featured a lecture by Dr. Hal Varian, the Chief Economist at Google and Professor Emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley, where he was the founding dean of the School of Information. Predicting the present or "nowcasting" is a topic of particular interest to central banks and government agencies. Dr. Varian's presentation showed how search engine data can be used to forecast the near-term values of important economic indicators such as retail, automotive, and housing sales; unemployment claims; travel destination planning; and consumer confidence.

Dr. Varian joined Google in 2002, and has worked on the design of advertising auctions, econometrics, finance, corporate strategy, and public policy. He has written two bestselling textbooks: Intermediate Microeconomics, an undergraduate microeconomics text, and Microeconomic Analysis, an advanced text. He received his BS from MIT in economics and both his MA (mathematics) and PhD (economics) from the University of California, Berkeley.

To learn more about the series, please contact Stuart Harshbarger at stuart.harshbarger@nera.com.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 8 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Financial Services Expert Dr. Ludwig Chincarini Affiliates with NERA Economic Consulting ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8088.htm New York-- NERA Economic Consulting announced today that Dr. Ludwig Chincarini, Professor of Finance at the School of Management of the University of San Francisco, has affiliated with NERA's Global Securities and Finance Practice as a Special Consultant. NERA is a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters.

Dr. Chincarini has extensive experience in the financial industry and has published in many academic journals in finance. He is the author of one of the classic books in the field of portfolio management, Quantitative Equity Portfolio Management, and is also the author of The Crisis of Crowding, a recent book explaining the causes of the financial crisis.

"Ludwig's background in the financial services industry, and particularly his expertise in portfolio management, quantitative equity management, and derivatives, makes him an invaluable addition to NERA's Securities and Finance Practice,” said Dr. Lawrence Wu, NERA's President. "He adds to the depth and breadth of our terrific Securities and Finance Practice, and he is an example of NERA's commitment to providing our clients with the insights of leading academics."

Dr. Chincarini's financial industry experience includes pioneering work helping to launch the S&P 500 equal-weight exchange traded fund (ETF) (Ticker: RSP), the first liquid hedge fund  ETF (Ticker: QAI), the first merger arbitrage ETF (Ticker: MNA), and many other alternative index ETFs. As Head of Research and Head of New Products at FOLIOfn, he helped develop the company's pioneering internet brokerage service. He has also worked for the Bank for International Settlements and for the asset management company Schroders in both equities and fixed income analysis, and has served as a consultant to hedge funds and money management organizations.

Dr. Chincarini currently serves on the academic council of IndexIQ. He holds a PhD in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a BA from the University of California at Berkeley.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 2 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Retail Energy Markets: Government Ignores Economics At Its Peril ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8115.htm Over twenty years ago, the Thatcher government embraced competition in the markets for electricity and gas in the UK, with the aim to increase efficiency, lower bills, and take government out of decision-making. In this article from New Power, NERA Director Graham Shuttleworth and Senior Consultant George Anstey argue that every government since then has acted as though it would rather restrain competition than embrace it -- pushing the electricity industry to use more British coal (Major), solve fuel poverty (Blair), convert to renewable energy (Brown), or to possibly build new nuclear power stations (Cameron). The latest retail market measures emerging from the UK Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) and Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) are still supposed to increase efficiency and to lower bills, but they place government decision-making in a central position. While the DECC and Ofgem justify their interventions by pointing to market failure, Mr. Shuttleworth and Mr. Anstey point out the risk of government failure in these interventions. The economics of competition offer plenty of reasons why these interventions may have adverse consequences, the authors note. Future governments may therefore regret being given a prominent role in energy sector decision-making.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Saturday, 27 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Handling a Securities Case 2013: From Investigation to Trial and Everything in Between ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8034.htm

This Practising Law Institute program, held in New York City and via live webcast on 25 April 2013, was designed to address all the issues that arise in even the most complex securities matters -- from the initial government investigation to the filing of the civil cases to either settlement or trial. As part of the program, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Patrick Conroy participated in a panel discussion entitled "Seeking Resolution: Strategies in Mediation and Settlement." Dr. Conroy and his co-panelists discussed various mediation techniques, settlement strategies, the use of experts in litigation, and issues related to D&O liability.

Learn more via the PLI website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Short Sale Constraints and Market Efficiency in Securities Litigation ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8083.htm The efficiency of the market in which a security trades is often a crucial component of class certification in securities litigation. In such cases, market efficiency analysis by the courts is often centered on analysis of the Cammer factors. In this NERA paper, Consultant Stefan Boettrich focuses on one specific Cammer factor, the existence of market makers and arbitrageurs in the market. In particular, an important issue to be addressed is whether traders are able to complete short sale transactions and thus fully participate in the market. A short sale enables a trader to take a negative position in a security, and is a crucial mechanism by which negative information can be rapidly reflected in market prices, but may be hindered by various constraints. Therefore, Mr. Boettrich points out, indicators of constraints to short sales are valuable in evaluating claims of market efficiency.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 24 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Economists Featured in The International Who's Who of Competition Lawyers & Economists ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8080.htm New York -- NERA Economic Consulting is pleased to congratulate its nominees for this year's International Who's Who of Competition Lawyers & Economists. NERA's competition team is well-represented once again, with nominees from nine offices in five countries highlighting the depth, breadth, and international footprint of the firm's competition and antitrust expertise.

The following NERA experts were included in the 2013 edition of The International Who's Who of Competition Lawyers & Economists:

Sumanth Addanki -- Senior Vice President, White Plains, NY

Greg Houston -- Director, Sydney, Australia

Andrew Joskow -- Senior Vice President, Washington, DC

Thomas McCarthy -- Senior Vice President, Los Angeles, CA

Linda McLaughlin -- Special Consultant, New York, NY

James Mellsop -- Director, Auckland, New Zealand

Richard Rapp -- Special Consultant, New York, NY

Ramsey Shehadeh -- Chair, Antitrust and Competition Practice, New York, NY

Lauren J. Stiroh -- Senior Vice President, White Plains, NY and Toronto, Canada

Mark Williams -- Director, European Competition Policy, London, UK

Lawrence Wu -- President, San Francisco, CA

The Who's Who Legal guide is published by Law Business Research Ltd, which also publishes Global Competition Review. Nominees for The International Who's Who of Competition Lawyers & Economists are selected by a survey of counsel and private practice lawyers worldwide.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 24 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Webcast: Hot Topics in Bankruptcy Litigation ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8053.htm On 24 April 2013, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Faten Sabry moderated a webcast discussion on recent trends in valuation and bankruptcy litigation. The panelists -- NERA Senior Consultant Raymund Wong, Weil Gotshal & Manges Partner Adam Strochak, and Greenberg Traurig Shareholder Nancy Peterman -- discussed the potential adaptations and changes to standard methodologies when valuing companies with going concern issues (in contrast to valuing companies with stable prospects, which is usually a simpler exercise). Furthermore, there appears to be increased litigation activity challenging acquisitions, and courts are starting to limit options. This webcast offered a general overview of these issues, as well as trends to be aware of if acquiring distressed assets.

Specifically, the panel discussed:

  • litigation trends impacting acquisition and transaction structures in bankruptcy;
  • the 7th circuit case Castleton Plaza, L.P., 707 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2013), which held that a plan providing 100% of the equity to an insider must be subject to competitive bidding;
  • cases addressing claims trading and whether the claim is subject to the same defenses in the hands of the acquirer, such as In re KB Toys, 470 BR 331 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012) as compared to an earlier case coming from the SDNY, In re Enron, 379 BR 425 (SDNY 2007); and
  • the recent Wamu decisions on treatment of hybrid securities.

Learn more via the West LegalEdcenter website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 24 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Saudi Sustainable Energy Symposium: Value Localization Series ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8072.htm This symposium, held in Riyadh on 23-24 April 2013, brought together government representatives, private sector organizations, local companies, international players, original equipment manufacturers, and potential investors to discuss the development of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's sustainable energy program. The event laid the groundwork for the initiation of the localization process of the manufacturing and services opportunities along the nuclear and renewables value chains in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. On the first day of the symposium, NERA Vice President Edward Kee moderated a panel of international nuclear industry executives as they discussed how vendors approach localization in the nuclear industry. The panel addressed how global vendors build a local supply chain with local partners for a sizeable nuclear program; the qualification process; the different types of technology transfers and partnerships with localized partners; and how to build successful relationships with localized partners in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Learn more about this event via the Saudi Sustainable Energy Symposium website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Macroeconomic Impacts of LNG Exports from the United States ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8081.htm At the request of the US Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, a NERA team led by Senior Vice President Dr. W. David Montgomery and Senior Consultant Dr. Sugandha Tuladhar has conducted an objective and independent study to assess the potential macroeconomic impacts on the US economy of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. The US has witnessed a significant shift in natural gas production in the past five years, as optimism about shale gas potential and accelerated recovery has created a shale gas boom. US shale gas production has increased rapidly due to advances in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques that have reduced production costs. As a result, the outlook for natural gas production is more optimistic now than ever before. According to the latest Annual Energy Outlook 2013, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that US natural gas production will increase by about 40% by 2040, and that shale gas will account for more than 50% of total US natural gas production by 2040. The primary objective of NERA's study was to evaluate the macroeconomic impacts of different levels of LNG exports based on the EIA's study. Using NERA's proprietary NewERA model and the Global Natural Gas Model, the NERA team found that increase in natural gas prices will be moderate and LNG exports will have net benefits to the US economy.

This paper was also published as an article on the Italian website AGI Energia.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ FERC's Enforcement Actions in Banking and Finance ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8051.htm Financial institutions that are engaged in trading, generating, or transmitting electrical power are now under the increasing scrutiny of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has recently begun bringing enforcement actions against several major financial institutions, including Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan. Once proved that they are in violation of FERC rules, such financial institutions face large fines and hefty penalties. To address these issues, NERA Senior Consultant Lilly Goldman joined a distinguished panel of experts for a Knowledge Congress webcast on 17 April 2013. The panel discussed the substantive issues relating to FERC's enforcement actions in the financial industry, and provided insight into the FERC investigation process. The webcast concluded with a Q&A session with the audience.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 17 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Marsh & McLennan: NERA Economic Consulting Lecture Series to Feature Google Chief Economist Dr. Hal Varian ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8063.htm

Washington, DC -- NERA Economic Consulting and its parent company, Marsh & McLennan Companies, are pleased to announce that Dr. Hal Varian, the Chief Economist at Google and Professor Emeritus at the University of California, will deliver an address on current economic events as part of the Marsh & McLennan: NERA Economic Consulting Lecture Series. The lecture will take place at the Marvin Center at the George Washington University on Wednesday, 8 May 2013, at 6:00 pm Eastern.

Marsh & McLennan Companies and NERA are proud to sponsor this series, which highlights the importance and impact of economics in business and regulatory environments.
 
In Dr. Varian's presentation, "Predicting the Present with Search Engine Data," he will show how search queries from Google can forecast  the near-term values of important economic indicators such as retail, automotive, and housing sales, unemployment claims, travel destination planning, and consumer confidence.
 
Dr. Varian joined Google in 2002, and has worked on the design of advertising auctions, econometrics, finance, corporate strategy, and public policy. He has written two bestselling textbooks: Intermediate Microeconomics, an undergraduate microeconomics text, and Microeconomic Analysis, an advanced text. He received his BS from MIT in economics and both his MA (mathematics) and PhD (economics) from the University of California, Berkeley, where he was the founding dean of the School of Information.
 
The Marsh & McLennan: NERA Economic Consulting Lecture Series on Current Economic Events is organized by The George Washington University's Department of Economics. This event is open to all alumni, faculty, students, and friends of the GW Department of Economics.
 
To learn more, please contact Stuart Harshbarger, NERA Vice President at stuart.harshbarger@nera.com.
 
About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

About Marsh & McLennan Companies
 
MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIES (NYSE: MMC) is a global professional services firm offering clients advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. Marsh is a global leader in insurance broking and risk management; Guy Carpenter is a global leader in providing risk and reinsurance intermediary services; Mercer is a global leader in talent, health, retirement, and investment consulting; and Oliver Wyman is a global leader in management consulting. Marsh & McLennan Companies' approximately 54,000 colleagues worldwide provide analysis, advice, and transactional capabilities to clients in more than 100 countries. The Company prides itself on being a responsible corporate citizen and making a positive impact in the communities in which it operates. Visit www.mmc.com for more information.

Contact

Dr. Stuart L. Harshbarger
Vice President
+1 212 345 2812
mailto:start.harshbarger@nera.com

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ EPRI-IETA Joint Symposium: The Interaction of Complementary Policies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap-and-Trade Programs ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8073.htm This event, co-hosted by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) in San Francisco on 16 April 2013, was part of an ongoing series of workshops designed to inform key constituencies about experience to date with greenhouse gas (GHG) emission offset policies, and to provide a forum in which participants representing a wide variety of stakeholders and perspectives can discuss important elements of possible future offset policies and program design issues. Dr. David Harrison, Senior Vice President and Co-Head of NERA's Environment Group, was invited to present "The Interactions of Complementary Policies with a GHG Cap and Trade Program: The Case of Europe," which he co-authored with NERA Associate Director Daniel Radov. Dr. Harrison provided an overview of European energy and climate  policies, and explained how renewable and energy efficiency programs (and other complementary policies) can affect the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), a cap-and-trade program that has been in place since 2005. He also provided some results modeling the effects of different combinations of policies on the European economy. Dr. Harrison then summarized various potential (non-cost) reasons for creating complementary EU policies, including international competitiveness concerns, interest in objectives other than climate change (such as energy security), and distrust in the market to provide enough investment opportunities.

Learn more about the EPRI-IETA Joint Symposium.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The Inside Scoop on Securities Litigation for 2013 ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8055.htm This Ross Roundtable, co-sponsored by New York University's Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research at NYU Stern School of Business and NERA Economic Consulting, examined recent developments in shareholder litigation and regulatory enforcement, the impact of regulatory reform, and current academic research. The program was held on 15 April 2013, and brought together a panel of top experts from a range of perspectives to present data and analysis relevant to current and future securities litigation. Two NERA experts, Senior Consultants Jorge Baez and Dr. Renzo Comolli, participated in the discussion. The Roundtable was coordinated by Paul Zarowin, Director, Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research, and NERA Senior Vice President Dr. David Tabak.

Roundtable Presenters:

  • Jorge Baez, Senior Consultant, NERA Economic Consulting
  • Mary Billings, Assistant Professor of Accounting, NYU Stern School of Business
  • James R. Burns, Deputy Director in the Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Renzo Comolli, Senior Consultant, NERA Economic Consulting
  • William C. Fredericks, Partner, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP
  • Kathleen McCarthy, Managing Director, Head of Litigation, RBS Americas
  • Richard D. Owens, Partner, Latham and Watkins LLP

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 15 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics at Fordham Law School with Sheila Bair ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8041.htm The Honorable Sheila C. Bair, former Chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, delivered the inaugural address of the Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics at Fordham Law School on 8 April 2013. The annual lecture was established to honor Dr. Fred Dunbar's pioneering role in securities litigation: raising the standard for economists' expert testimony from one comfortable with subjective opinion to one emphasizing objective, scientifically-based analysis. Fordham Law School is hosting the series in conjunction with NERA, the firm that Dr. Dunbar called home for three decades and whose Securities and Finance Practice he founded. Dr. Dunbar passed away in February 2012. Ms. Bair served as the 19th Chairperson of the FDIC from 2006-2011, during one of the most difficult periods of financial instability the US has ever faced. She was instrumental in establishing programs that restored confidence and stability to financial markets after the 2008 financial crisis.

For more information on the Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics, please visit the Fordham University website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 8 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Margaret Thatcher: one policy that led to more than 50 companies being sold or privatised ]]> http://www.nera.com/82_8059.htm

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 8 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Assessment of the ICRC's Proposed Regulatory Model ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8089.htm In this report for ACTEW Water (ACTEW), a NERA team led by Associate Director Ann Whitfield assesses the Australian Independent Competition and Regulatory Commission’s (ICRC) proposed regulatory model for the forthcoming Price Determination period, as set out in its 2013 Draft Report on ACTEW's regulated water and sewerage services. The report reviews and critiques the ICRC's proposal to depart from a regime in which allowed revenues and prices are determined on a five-yearly basis, to one in which they are determined on a two-yearly basis, beginning in 2013.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 8 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ How Medco Won Antitrust Approval For A Deal Wall Street Considered Doomed ]]> http://www.nera.com/82_8065.htm

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 8 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Drinker Biddle and NERA Economic Consulting Hold Joint Program to Discuss Abusive Patent Troll Practices and Effective Responses to Them ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8060.htm Los Angeles, CA -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP and NERA Economic Consulting are co-sponsoring a luncheon on May 8, 2013 at the Four Seasons Hotel Silicon Valley at East Palo Alto to discuss effective responses to patent infringement claims and threats of such claims from patent assertion entities -- also known as patent trolls. The Four Seasons Hotel Silicon Valley is located at 2050 University Avenue, East Palo Alto.  The luncheon will be held from 12:00 – 2:00 p.m. PT.

The luncheon program will provide insights on both patent law and antitrust law responses to patent troll practices -- including discussion of challenges to portfolio acquisitions from operating companies that retain roles in subsequent enforcement actions against their rivals, proposed United States Patent and Trademark Office actions and potential legislative solutions.

Featured speakers include:

Cynthia Bright, Associate General Counsel, IP Litigation & Public Policy,
Hewlett-Packard Company

Michelle Lee, Director, USPTO Silicon Valley Office

Fiona Scott Morton, Professor, Yale School of Management and former Chief Economist of the Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice

Other speakers include Drinker Biddle’s Bob Skitol and NERA’s Alan Cox.

This complimentary program will also be available via webcast and 1.5 CLE credit will be offered for in-person attendees.

To register, click here. Please RSVP by Friday, May 3, 2013. Contact Meredith Brusca, Client Events Supervisor at (215) 988-3344 or Meredith.Brusca@dbr.com with any questions.

ABOUT DRINKER BIDDLE
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is a national law firm with 650 lawyers in 11 offices providing client service in areas such as intellectual property, commercial litigation, communications litigation, corporate and securities, corporate restructuring, employee benefits and executive compensation, environment and energy, government and regulatory affairs, health care, insurance coverage, investment management,  labor and employment, life insurance and annuities, products liability and mass tort litigation, private client services, and real estate.

ABOUT NERA ECONOMIC CONSULTING
NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA’s economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 1 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Understanding 'Frequent Survey Responders' on Online Panels ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8052.htm Internet surveys are not only growing in popularity in the market research industry, but in the legal industry as well. However, Internet surveys face several challenges. For instance, because there is no comprehensive list of the 71 percent of Americans who have Internet access at home, researchers must somehow find an alternate means of constructing sampling frames, or lists of individuals to sample for a given survey, for their studies. The most common solution to this problem is using an "online panel" of respondents that a research company has recruited. A potential issue stemming from the use of online panels is "frequent survey responders" (FSRs) who belong to online panels. As the name suggests, these are respondents who take more surveys, on average, than does the average online panel member.
 
In this NERA paper, Consultant Healey C. Whitsett conducts a systematic review of the literature describing research that has been done on frequent survey responders -- in total, this review considers 16 publications. To begin this review, Ms. Whitsett explains the reasons why researchers are concerned about FSRs. She then examines how FSRs are defined in the literature, FSRs' demographic characteristics, whether FSRs' reports of attitudes and/or behaviors differ from those of respondents who take surveys less frequently, and what impact, if any, FSRs' responses have on data quality.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 1 April 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The Solvency Two-Step ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8054.htm In this guest post from the Weil Bankruptcy Blog, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. David Tabak examines the economic relationship between the balance-sheet and cash-flow tests for insolvency. Questions of solvency often arise in bankruptcy and related matters such as claims of fraudulent conveyance. One would hope that such an important concept would have a single, clear definition along with a single test, but this is not the case. In fact, there are two standard definitions of solvency used in the courts along with associated tests. Dr. Tabak discusses the relationships between those tests and addresses the question of what to do if different tests yield apparently divergent results, either in terms of the ultimate solvency question or even on the degree to which a company is said to be either solvent or insolvent.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 29 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Economic Consulting Congratulates Elaine Buckberg on Her New Position with the US Treasury Department ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8050.htm New York -- NERA Economic Consulting wishes to congratulate Dr. Elaine Buckberg on her appointment as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy Coordination in the Office of Economic Policy at the US Treasury Department. Dr. Buckberg has taken on the Treasury Department position after serving as a senior member of NERA's Securities and Finance Practice since 2001, most recently as Senior Vice President.
 
"Elaine's appointment to this key position reflects her deep knowledge and expertise in the field of economics," said NERA President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "We at NERA are pleased that Treasury has made such a wise choice, and wish Elaine the best in what will surely be an exciting and challenging assignment."

Dr. Buckberg's  research has been widely published and she has been co-author of NERA's ongoing study of settlement trends in SEC enforcement actions since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Dr. Buckberg holds a PhD in economics from MIT with concentrations in macroeconomics and international finance. Her graduate studies were supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. Dr. Buckberg received her BA in economics and English from Yale University, magna cum laude.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For nearly half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from over 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 26 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Setting Efficient Tariffs for Wastewater Infrastructure ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8110.htm Pricing in the water industry is a politically sensitive issue in many countries. Observers have long noted that tariffs for water services are often not high enough to cover the costs of the network and offer efficient signals to customers, but this is also true for wastewater services. Setting prices for all water services in a manner that reflects the utilities' costs is a key management issue for increasing efficiency in the sector. Without cost-reflective tariffs, water utilities may run into financial difficulty or suffer from a shortage of capacity and have to ration services between users. In this article, first published in Water Utility Management International, NERA Senior Consultant George Anstey discusses the results of a survey -- undertaken of five well-developed regimes from the UK, Australia, the US, and Brazil -- which found examples of good practice. However, Mr. Anstey notes, even at this level tariffs may not recover full costs of wastewater infrastructure or provide efficient signals. This article explains why tariffs reflecting costs are important for increasing efficiency, and provides a snapshot of the state of best regulatory practice.

This article was first published in the March Edition of Water Utility Management International as "Achieving Efficiency of Wastewater: A Survey of International Best Practice" (http://www.iwaponline.com/wumi/00801/wumi008010015.htm)

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 25 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Announces Appointment of New Practice Chairs ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8047.htm New York -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, announced today the appointment of three new practice chairs.

In NERA's Intellectual Property Practice, Dr. Alan Cox has been named Practice Chair. Dr. Cox replaces Dr. Phillip Beutel, who was recently named as NERA's Chief Operating Officer. In the Global Transfer Pricing Practice, Dr. Emmanuel Llinares has been named Practice Chair. His predecessor, Dr. Harlow Higinbotham, remains with the firm as a Senior Vice President. In the firm's Global Securities and Finance Practice, Dr. Patrick Conroy has been appointed Chair. He replaces Dr. Marcia Kramer Mayer, who also remains with the firm as a Senior Vice President.

"On behalf of all of us at NERA, I would like to thank Phil, Harlow, and Marcia for their exceptional service to the firm as practice chairs," said NERA President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "They have all been instrumental in building their respective practices into the global leaders they are today. I look forward to working with Alan, Emmanuel, and Pat in continuing and building on their great work."

Practice Chairs

Dr. Alan Cox, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Intellectual Property Practice, has testified on a wide variety of patent issues in the semiconductor, biotechnology, telecommunications, software, consumer products, and other industries. He has also testified on trademark, copyright, and trade secret matters, and in matters related to standards and patent pools. In arbitrations he has appeared before the NASD, the American Arbitration Association, and the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association. Before joining NERA in 1988, his previous positions include Visiting Economist at MIT's Energy Laboratory. He holds a PhD in economic analysis and policy from the Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
 
Dr. Emmanuel Llinares, Director and Chair of NERA's Global Transfer Pricing Practice, specializes in inter-company pricing, valuation, and intellectual property analyses. For a number of years, he has advised multinational companies on defining and implementing their intra-group pricing policies and has assisted them with design, documentation, and tax audit defense. Dr. Llinares also assists clients in the context of commercial or intellectual property-related litigations.  Prior to joining NERA in 2005, Dr. Llinares was an economist with Arthur Andersen in London and with the KPMG Tax network in Paris. He holds a PhD in economics from the University of Delaware and the University of Lyon.

Dr. Patrick Conroy, Senior Vice President and Chair of NERA's Global Securities and Finance Practice, specializes in economic analysis of securities and finance issues. His work at NERA has included expert testimony and consulting involving securities fraud, mutual and hedge fund trading, exchange-traded funds, securities lending, broker-dealer disputes, derivatives, leases, swaps, and private equity valuation disputes. He has also provided opinions on damages in bribery cases under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and UK Bribery Act. Prior to joining NERA in 2001, Dr. Conroy was an economist with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. He holds a PhD in economics from the University of Miami.
 
About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from over 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 25 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Practical Aspects of Implementing Intercompany Royalties, Service Charges, and Development Activities for Russian Affiliates of MNCs ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8043.htm The Russian Federation joining the World Trade Organization and adopting comprehensive transfer pricing regulations were significant developments in 2012. The former event is expected to increase the volume of cross-border trade with Russia, while the latter may prompt multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in Russia to focus their attention on the pricing of intercompany transactions involving the Russian affiliates. In this NERA brief, Vice President Dr. Vladimir Starkov describes how the Russian Tax Code treats royalties paid by Russian taxpayers to foreign taxpayers, management services fees and technical assistance fees in Russia, and engineering and development activities in Russia.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Wage-and-hour settlements rise in 2012 - NERA ]]> http://www.nera.com/82_8039.htm

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 20 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Antitrust Expert Dr. Chetan Sanghvi Joins NERA Economic Consulting ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8037.htm Washington, DC -- NERA Economic Consulting, a leading global provider of economic advice and analysis in business, legal, and regulatory matters, is pleased to announce that former US Federal Trade Commission economist Dr. Chetan Sanghvi has joined the firm as a Senior Vice President in NERA's Antitrust and Competition Practice. Dr. Sanghvi is based in NERA's Washington, DC office.
 
Dr. Sanghvi is an expert in the field of industrial organization and antitrust economics, with a specialization in the analysis of liability and damages in competition and commercial litigation. He has evaluated the competitive impacts of numerous proposed corporate mergers in the US, Canada, and Europe and has extensive experience providing expert economic and statistical testimony in antitrust cases, as well as matters involving alleged trademark and patent infringement, breach of contract, and Lanham Act violations. His expertise covers issues involving horizontal and vertical mergers; vertical restraints, including M.A.P. requirements, distribution, licensing and after-market issues; pay-for-delay; collusion; and foreclosure and exclusion.

"Dr. Sanghvi's experience as a senior economist, an antitrust and public policy practitioner, and a respected academic is a welcome addition to the leadership of NERA’s Antitrust and Competition Practice in Washington, DC," said NERA President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "Chetan brings a wealth of practical expertise in the economic analysis and exposition of competition policy and damages that will be a tremendous asset to NERA's clients." 

Dr. Sanghvi joins NERA from the Federal Trade Commission, where he was Economics Advisor to the office of Commissioner Brill, the testifying economics expert in numerous competition matters and the lead economist on major FTC litigations such as FTC v. Whole Foods. While at the FTC, he was also the lead economist on an inter-agency Presidential task force on pricing and competition in the oil industry and provided technical aid and training to the Competition Commission of India. His work at the FTC covered numerous industries, including health care, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, search engines and the internet, consumer and industrial products, entertainment, and retail services. Before that, he held senior positions at several economic consulting firms, including Senior Consultant at NERA. Dr. Sanghvi has taught graduate economic theory at New York University, and industrial organization, antitrust policy, and game theory at Johns Hopkins University, Rutgers University, and Trinity College (Hartford). He holds a PhD in economics from Rutgers University and a BA in economics from Northwestern University.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world’s leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on issues arising from competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Monday, 18 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ 2013 Compliance & Legal Society Annual Seminar ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8013.htm SIFMA held its annual Compliance & Legal Society Seminar in Phoenix on 17-20 March 2013 to address the latest regulatory developments and industry trends. On 19 March, NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Vinita Juneja participated in a panel discussion entitled "Litigation Update: Securities Class Action Trends." Dr. Juneja provided a statistical overview of recent filings and the nature of the cases, as well as an analysis of recent settlements. She also discussed current approaches to damages estimation in securities litigation.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Sunday, 17 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Economic Consulting Releases Wage and Hour Settlements Trends Report ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8044.htm New York -- Wage and hour settlements for US companies totaled $467 million in 2012, largely in line with previous years, according to NERA Economic Consulting's Trends in Wage and Hour Settlements: 2012 Update, released today.

The annual study analyzes cases involving allegations of current and/or former employees' unpaid work, including unpaid overtime, failure to provide meals and/or rest breaks, and off-the-clock work. NERA Trends authors have compiled a proprietary database of all wage and hour settlements identified between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2012.

For 2012, 102 wage and hour cases were settled compared to the 107 settled in 2011. On average companies paid $4.8 million to resolve a case last year, up slightly from the $4.6 million identified in 2011. The median settlement value for wage and hour cases was $1.7 million in 2012, only slightly higher than the $1.6 million median observed in 2011. Trends authors found a decrease in the average settlement value per plaintiff per class year—the average for 2012 was $1,300 versus the $1,500 observed in 2011.

Notably, an increase in settlements involving allegations of minimum wage and overtime violations was observed in 2012, relative to prior years. The healthcare service industry also paid a larger proportion of settlement dollars compared to previous years—27% in 2012 compared to 4% over the prior five-year period.
 
Trends authors for the 2012 study compared NERA's wage and hour settlement data to concluded actions taken by the Department of Labor's (DOL's) Wage and Hour Compliance Division over the prior six-year period. NERA found that 58% of companies with a wage and hour settlement between 2007 and 2012 had also been investigated by the DOL's Wage and Hour Compliance Division. In addition, 28% of companies in NERA's wage and hour settlement database were found by the DOL to have an FLSA violation, with back wages associated with these violations totaling $18.8 million.

Additional Trends in Wage and Hour Settlements

  • Over the 2007-2012 period, aggregate wage and hour settlement payments were $2.7 billion.
  • 446 wage and hour cases were settled over the prior six-year period.
  • Cases with extremely large classes, 10,000 plaintiffs or more, have been decreasing over the past five years. Only 5% of settlements in 2012 were for such cases.
  • The average duration of a class period for wage and hour cases in NERA's database in five years.
  • 60% of wage and hour cases in our database involve at least two allegations. Approximately 15% of the cases have an allegation of overtime only, while another 56% of cases include an allegation of overtime in addition to one or more allegations.

Trends in Wage and Hour Settlements: 2012 Update is authored by Dr. Denise Martin, Chair of NERA's Employment and Labor Practice, Dr. Stephanie Plancich, Vice President, and Janeen McIntosh, Senior Analyst. The study may be downloaded from: http://www.nera.com/67_8031.htm

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on business and legal issues involving competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 13 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Trends in Wage and Hour Settlements: 2012 Update ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8031.htm

In wage and hour litigation, current and/or former employees allege unpaid work, including unpaid overtime, failure to provide meals and/or rest breaks, and off-the-clock work. Cases may be brought under state law or under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. These cases may result in civil settlements or verdicts, as well as in back wages and penalties levied by the Department of Labor. In this update to NERA's ongoing analysis of settlements in wage and hour cases, Senior Vice President Dr. Denise Martin, Vice President Dr. Stephanie Plancich, and Senior Analyst Janeen McIntosh expand their analysis to include cases settled in 2012.

The authors find that, in 2012, companies continued to pay substantial amounts to settle lawsuits involving allegations of wage and hour violations. They identify total wage and hour settlement payments of $467 million in 2012, bringing the aggregate amount paid over the past six years to approximately $2.7 billion. A relatively steady number of identified cases settled before trial each year, with 102 in 2012 and a total of 446 over the last six years. They also find that more than 50% of the companies with a wage and hour settlement between 2007 and 2012 had also been investigated by the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Compliance division

On average, companies paid $4.8 million to resolve a case in 2012, up slightly from the $4.6 million observed in 2011, but lower than the overall average of $7.5 million for the 2007 to 2012 period. The median settlement value for 2012 of $1.7 million was also slightly higher than the $1.6 million median in 2011.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 12 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Workshop on Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation Project ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8045.htm NERA Senior Consultant Richard Druce was invited to participate in a workshop run by the Electrical Engineering Department at Imperial College London as part of Imperial's Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation Project. The workshop covered the market, regulatory, and institutional framework required to promote the efficient development and operation of British transmission system. Mr. Druce responded to a presentation on electricity market design issues, focusing on the importance of locational signals in promoting efficient investment in the power sector.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 7 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Connecting Wholesale and Retail Pricing: A Look at Required Policy and Market Design Decisions ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8033.htm The architects of wholesale energy markets in the US and elsewhere envisioned that signals generated in those markets would be passed onto end users in a timely manner through retail prices. For a variety of reasons this has not been the case. On 7 March 2013, to examine the implications on the progress of wholesale market designs moving forward, the Harvard Electricity Policy Group hosted a panel of demand response experts for a discussion on "Wholesale/Retail Pricing: Can the Disconnected Realities Be Bridged?" As part of the panel, NERA Senior Consultant Amparo Nieto discussed the key conditions that need to exist to enable straightforward, market-based price incentives via an effective price responsive demand (PRD). Ms. Nieto argued that PRD, as enabled by smart meters, can bring back the missing value of scarce capacity at times of system constraints to the energy markets, but PRD will only attract enough interest if the right measures are taken to acknowledge the impact of PRD at the ISO level. She also pointed out that meaningful progress of PRD will require state regulatory commissions to embrace dynamic rates for default service for small commercial and residential customers, not just for the largest customers. In addition to the expert presentations, the panel also featured a Q&A session between the panel and the audience. 

 

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 7 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ The 27th Annual National Institute on White Collar Crime ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8030.htm NERA was a proud sponsor of the 2013 White Collar Crime National Institute, which took place in Las Vegas on 6-8 March.

The 2013 keynote panels focused on the most significant white collar criminal trials of the past year, and on the ethical obligations of white collar lawyers. The Institute featured significant representation from the corporate sector, including members of the legal and compliance groups of General Electric, General Dynamics, Goldman Sachs, International Game Technology, Pfizer, Raytheon, Qualcomm, and UBS. The Institute also included senior members of the Department of Justice, prosecutors, and distinguished members of the federal judiciary.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 6 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ NERA Expert Dr. Alan Cox Addresses Intellectual Property Students in Beijing ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8027.htm NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Alan Cox was invited to address the course in "Intellectual Property Legal Practice" at Beijing University School of Law on 3 March 2013. The course, managed by the Beijing office of King & Wood Mallesons, is designed to enable students to master the basic theory and practice of intellectual property law. Dr. Cox discussed issues of intellectual property valuation, damages assessment, and possible anticompetitive uses of intellectual property incorporated into standards.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Sunday, 3 March 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Former FDIC Chairperson Sheila C. Bair to Deliver the Inaugural Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics at Fordham Law School ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8012.htm New York -- The Honorable Sheila C. Bair, former Chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, will deliver the inaugural address of the Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics at Fordham Law School on 8 April 2013. The annual lecture was established to honor Dr. Fred Dunbar's pioneering role in securities litigation: raising the standard for economists’ expert testimony from one comfortable with subjective opinion to one emphasizing objective, scientifically-based analysis. Fordham Law School is hosting the series in conjunction with NERA Economic Consulting, the firm that Dr. Dunbar called home for three decades and whose Securities and Finance Practice he founded. Dr. Dunbar passed away in February 2012.

Ms. Bair served as the 19th Chairperson of the FDIC from 2006-2011, during one of the most difficult periods of financial instability the US has ever faced. She was instrumental in establishing programs that restored confidence and stability to financial markets after the 2008 financial crisis. Currently, Ms. Bair is a senior advisor at The Pew Charitable Trusts, where she also leads the Systemic Risk Council, a private-sector group that monitors and encourages regulatory reform of US capital markets to reduce systemic risk.

"We at NERA are delighted that someone of Sheila Bair's stature has agreed to give the first of a series of lectures to honor Fred and advance his commitment to  having rigorous economic analysis inform matters of public policy," said NERA Economic Consulting President Dr. Lawrence Wu. "We are proud to partner with Fordham Law School in what will certainly be a stellar lecture series."

Dr. Dunbar was one of the most respected and sought-after economics experts in cases involving securities and finance. He was retained in over 500 securities litigations and arbitrations over the course of his career, providing influential testimony in US federal and state courts and arbitration venues, and also testifying abroad. Dr. Dunbar was instrumental in helping to grow NERA into one of the world's largest and most well regarded economic consulting firms. After retiring from the firm in 2009, Dr. Dunbar became an Economic Fellow in the Office of Economic Analysis of the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Working with the Division of Risk, Strategy and Financial Innovation, he supported the Commission in enforcement and fraud detection. Earlier in his career he had been an Adjunct Professor at Fordham University School of Law.

For more information on the Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics, visit: http://ow.ly/i6EXa

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on business and legal issues involving competition, regulation, public policy, strategy, finance, and litigation.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 27 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Non-Deliverable Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts At A Glance ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8010.htm Exposure to foreign exchange rate risk is often hedged with forward foreign exchange (“FX”) contracts, which fix an exchange rate now for settlement at a future date. The parties to an FX forward agree to buy or sell a currency at a specified exchange rate, at a specified quantity and on a specified future date. On the specified future date, the two parties exchange the currency amounts to settle their claims under the contract.

Some countries’ monetary authorities impose restrictions on their currency’s convertibility in order to regulate the currency’s inflow and outflow. As a consequence, offshore parties can face difficulty hedging their exposure with forward contracts as such transactions might not be allowed under the currency restrictions. As a result, markets for non-deliverable forwards, which do not require the exchange of the
non-convertible currency, have developed.

A non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contract (“NDF”) is similar to a regular forward FX contract but does not require physical delivery of the designated currencies at maturity. Instead, the NDF specifies an exchange rate (“contracted forward exchange rate” or simply “forward rate”) against a convertible currency, typically...

[To read more, please download the full PDF]

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 27 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Estimating Employment Impacts of Regulations: A Review of EPA's Methods for Its Air Rules ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8015.htm In this report, prepared for the US Chamber of Commerce, a NERA team including Senior Vice President By Dr. Anne E. Smith, Senior Consultant Dr. Mei Yuan, and Consultant Dr. Will Gans reviews and evaluates how the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been estimating the employment impacts of its air regulations in the Regulatory Impact Analyses (RIAs) that EPA must provide to the Office of the President for all of its major regulations. The team considers the methods EPA has applied dating back to 1997, when the fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standard was first promulgated. NERA's report discusses three overarching conclusions about EPA’s employment impact estimation methods and areas for improvement in the future: 1) EPA makes insufficient use of full-economy models; 2) EPA makes excessive and inappropriate use of a 2002 paper by Morgenstern, Pizer, and Shih as a basis for its most recent job impact estimates; and 3) EPA should develop explicit and sound methodology-selection criteria to be applied in future RIAs.

Download addendum to report here.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 27 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Electric Utility Rate Cases: New Challenges and Fresh Thinking for Cost Recovery, Rate Setting, and the Rate Case Process ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8026.htm This Law Seminars International conference, held in Las Vegas on 21-22 February 2013, examined the current ratemaking environment for regulated gas and electric companies as well as the numerous challenges facing regulators, utilities, customer groups, and those who represent them. On the first day of the conference, Dr. David Harrison, Senior Vice President and Co-Head of NERA's Environmental Economics Group, participated in a session entitled "New Environmental Controls for Coal Plants and Large Hydro: Should They Continue to Run Given the Environmental Costs and Concerns?" Dr. Harrison's presentation (with Consultant Andrew Foss), "Cumulative Energy Market Impacts of Various Environmental Regulations," provided an overview of major US air emissions, water, and waste regulations and summarized a recent NERA study evaluating their cumulative effects on the electricity and energy markets.

Learn more via the LSI website.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Economic Outcomes of a US Carbon Tax ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8014.htm In this report, prepared for the National Association of Manufacturers, a NERA team led by Senior Vice Presidents Dr. Anne E. Smith and Dr. David Harrison evaluates the potential impacts on the US economy from possible future carbon taxes whose revenues would be devoted to a combination of debt and tax rate reduction. NERA's project team – which also included Senior Vice President Dr. W. David Montgomery, Vice Presidents Dr. Paul Bernstein and Scott Bloomberg, Senior Consultants Dr. Sugandha Tuladhar and Dr. Mei Yuan, and Consultants Dr. Will Gans, Dr. Noah Kaufman, and Sebastian Mankowski – used NERA's NewERA model to develop estimates of the effects of a carbon tax on the US economy as well as on emissions and energy markets. Such economic consequences are important so that the economic effects of a specific carbon tax policy can be compared to estimates of the environmental effects of the policy. The results take into account the varied economic effects of fossil fuel cost increases due to a carbon tax as well as the positive economic effects of the assumption that carbon tax revenues would be used to reduce Federal government debt and Federal taxes.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Sunday, 17 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ FERC's U-Turn on Transmission Rate Incentives ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8028.htm In this paper, NERA Vice President Kurt Strunk and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Partner Julia Sullivan analyze a recent Policy Statement from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on transmission incentives, which retreats from FERC's prior approach broadly applying the incentive returns on equity (ROE) across the transmission sector. Such a policy change has sweeping implications for investors in the midstream electric utilities business. In the Policy Statement, FERC revised its incentive policies by concluding that risk-reducing regulatory provisions, such as recovery of 100% of construction work in progress and abandoned plant costs, may lessen the need for incentive ROE adders. In addition, FERC stated that it expects applicants for an incentive ROE to commit to limiting the application of that ROE to a certain estimated cost. Expenditures on the project exceeding that cost would not receive the incentive ROE. The authors note that, although FERC stated that it is open to differing approaches regarding this commitment, it seems to favor the estimated cost used for the project in the regional planning process.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 15 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Energy Trading Compliance Under the New CFTC Swap and the CFTC and FERC Anti-Manipulation Rules ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_8001.htm NERA Vice President Dr. Sharon Brown-Hruska, a former Commissioner and Acting Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and Charles R. Mills, Partner at K&L Gates and former CFTC attorney, led an EUCI webinar on 15 February 2013 on the CFTC's new and complex swap rules and anti-manipulation rules governing trading of energy swaps, forwards, and spot transactions. Specifically, the webinar addressed new liberalized elements of CFTC anti-manipulation rule 180.1 and disruptive trading practices, as well as certain measures that can strengthen internal compliance programs. Dr. Brown-Hruska and Mr. Mills provided their insights on a number of topics, including: essential elements of energy compliance programs that address the new CFTC rules; issues raised by the new CFTC Disruptive Trading Practices prohibitions; the need for enhanced protocols in communicating with regulators and exchange surveillance staff; how to avoid charges against end users for abuse of swap clearing exemption; understanding the developing and liberalized CFTC and US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concepts of manipulation; prohibitions against trading on unlawfully obtained material non-public information; and screens for detecting problematic trading.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Friday, 15 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Canadian Securities Class Action Filings Dip in 2012, According to NERA Economic Consulting Report ]]> http://www.nera.com/83_8003.htm Toronto -- Filings of securities class actions in Canada declined to nine new cases during 2012 from the record 15 new filings in 2011, and lower than the average of 12 cases per year since 2008, according to NERA Economic Consulting's report released today, Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2012 Update.

All of the new filings for 2012 were shareholder class actions, and in contrast to previous years' filings, none involved allegations of Ponzi schemes, claims relating to the credit crisis, or claims against North American-listed Chinese companies. The abatement of these recent trends in filings was consistent with the experience in the US during 2012. However, none of the nine cases filed in Canada appear to be related to the surge in merger objection cases seen in the US over the last three years.

Case Resolutions

Three securities class actions were settled in 2012 (excluding partial settlements)—two Bill 198 cases (Article Glacier for $13.8 million and Gammon Gold for $13.25 million) and one Ponzi scheme case (RBC settled claims relating to the Earl Jones Ponzi scheme for $17 million). The median settlement for all Canadian securities class action settlements (excluding partial settlements) in NERA’s database is $13 million.

Notably in 2012, Ernst & Young agreed to pay $117 million to settle claims relating to its role as auditor of Chinese company Sino-Forest. This partial settlement, if approved, would represent the largest settlement in a Bill 198 case to date.
 
Active Cases

With nine new securities class actions filed and the resolution of five cases during 2012, there were 51 active Canadian securities class actions as of 31 December. This is nearly double the number of active cases four years ago. NERA's database now includes data for 100 Canadian securities class actions filed since 1997.
 
"The growing number of active cases on the docket and the recent court rulings suggest that we may see both more cases move to the leave application and certification stages and possibly more settlements in 2013 than we saw in 2012," said NERA Vice President Bradley Heys, co-author of the report.

Canadian Securities Class Actions: Key Trends

  • Eight of the nine cases filed in 2012 involved issuers with securities listed on the TSX.
  • Bill 198 cases made up the majority of filings in 2012, accounting for eight of the nine cases filed—in line with previous years.
  • All of the cases filed in 2012 were filed in Ontario. Two cases (SNC-Lavalin and Agnico-Eagle) were also filed in Québec. The claims against Facebook and GLG Life Tech Corp were also filed in British Columbia.
  • Six of the nine new class actions in 2012 also had parallel US filings: Angico-Eagle, BP p.l.c., Facebook, GLG Life Tech, Kinross Gold, and Nevsun Resources.
  • Two-thirds of the new cases filed in 2012 were brought against companies in the mining or oil and gas sectors.
  • Continuing a the trend toward faster filing, the median time to file from the end of the proposed class period to the date of filing for cases filed in 2012 was approximately 3.1 months, and the average was 4.6 months.
  • Two cases were dismissed during 2012—cases brought against Western Coal and CIBC.
    55% of the 51 active cases are Bill 198 cases, representing more than $19 billion in claimed damages.
  • US securities class actions filings were made against six Canadian-domiciled companies in 2012, bringing the total number of active US cases against Canadian-domiciled companies to 17.

Class Action Trends Series

NERA has been analyzing trends in securities class actions for more than 20 years. In addition to this Canada Trends report, the firm produces two US Trends studies annually, as well as reports for the UK, Australia, Japan, and Italy. This year-end study was authored by NERA Economic Consulting Senior Vice President Mark L. Berenblut and Vice President Bradley A. Heys.

Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2012 Update may be downloaded from: http://www.nera.com/67_8002.htm.

About NERA

NERA Economic Consulting (www.nera.com) is a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. For over half a century, NERA's economists have been creating strategies, studies, reports, expert testimony, and policy recommendations for government authorities and the world's leading law firms and corporations. We bring academic rigor, objectivity, and real world industry experience to bear on business and legal issues involving compom more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

NERA's clients value our ability to apply and communicate state-of-the-art approaches clearly and convincingly, our commitment to deliver unbiased findings, and our reputation for quality and independence. Our clients rely on the integrity and skills of our unparalleled team of economists and other experts backed by the resources and reliability of one of the world's largest economic consultancies. With its main office in New York City, NERA serves clients from more than 20 offices across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Thursday, 14 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2012 Update Pace of Filings and Settlements Falls; Auditor Risk and Court Rulings Take Centre Stage ]]> http://www.nera.com/67_8002.htm Nine new securities class actions were filed in Canada during 2012, according to this newly released edition of NERA's ongoing study, Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2012 Update. This is lower than the record 15 filings in 2011, and below the annual average of 12 cases per year since 2008.

The study's co-authors, Vice President Bradley A. Heys and Senior Vice President Mark L. Berenblut, report that all of the new filings for 2012 were shareholder class actions, and in contrast to previous years' filings, none involved allegations of Ponzi schemes, claims relating to the credit crisis, or claims against North American-listed Chinese companies. The abatement of these recent trends in filings was consistent with the experience in the US during 2012. However in 2012, none of the nine cases filed in Canada during 2012 appear to be related to  the surge in merger objection cases seen in the US over the last three years.

Three Canadian securities class actions were settled in 2012, excluding partial settlements -- two Bill 198 cases and one Ponzi scheme case. The median settlement for all Canadian securities class action settlements (excluding partial settlements) in NERA's database is $13 million. Notably in 2012, Ernst & Young agreed to pay $117 million to settle claims relating to its role as auditor of Chinese company Sino-Forest. This partial settlement, if approved, would represent the largest settlement in a Bill 198 case to date.

The authors also report that, with nine new securities class actions filed and the resolution of five cases during 2012, there were 51 active Canadian securities class actions at December 31. This is nearly double the number of active cases four years ago. NERA's database now includes data for 100 Canadian securities class actions filed since 1997.

NERA has been analyzing trends in securities class actions for more than 20 years. In addition to this Canada Trends report, the firm produces two US Trends studies annually, and reports for the UK, Australia, Japan, and Italy.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Wednesday, 13 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT
<![CDATA[ Webcast: Fraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercompany Loans and Guaranties ]]> http://www.nera.com/68_7988.htm Intercorporate guaranties, such as upstream, downstream, and cross-stream guaranties, are commonly found in many financing deals. Enforcement of intercompany obligations presents risks that the guaranty may be avoided for lack of consideration or as a fraudulent conveyance if the guarantor files bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy, critical issues include whether the guarantor received "reasonably equivalent value" in exchange for the guaranty obligation and whether the guarantor was insolvent at the time the transaction occurred. NERA Special Consultant Dr. Kose John was invited to address these issues in a 90-minute CLE webcast on 12 February 2013. Dr. John and his co-panelists, Kyung S. Lee of Diamond McCarthy and Mark D. Bloom of Greenberg Traurig, provided bankruptcy counsel with a review of the legal and economic issues in preferential transfer and fraudulent conveyance avoidance actions for intercorporate guaranties. The panel outlined how lenders and corporate borrowers can best minimize risk and exposure.

]]>
NERA Economic Consulting Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:00:00 GMT