NERA PUBLICATIONS


RELATED EXPERTS:
Dr. Lawrence Wu Dr. Andrew Carron Lucy P. Allen Dr. William Baker Dr. Elizabeth BeckerDr. Phillip Beutel Dr. Patrick Conroy Dr. David Harrison Jr.Dr. Harlow Higinbotham Greg Houston Adrian Kemp Mike King Dr. Chantale LaCasse Dr. Emmanuel Llinares Dr. Marcia Kramer Mayer James Mellsop Dr. John Montgomery Dr. W. David MontgomeryDr. Chetan SanghviDr. Ramsey Shehadeh Dr. Jon Wainwright Dr. Mark Williams Dr. Paul BernsteinMatthew Evans Sébastien Gonnet Dr. Anne Gron James Heidell Bradley A. Heys Dr. Graeme Hunter Edward Kee Christopher Laursen Nihan Mert-Beydilli Dr. Ron Miller Dr. Elizabeth Newlon Carlos Pabon-Agudelo Dr. Stephanie Plancich Daniel Radov Dr. Bernard Reddy Sandra Ringelstetter Ennis Dr. Agustin Ros Dr. Vladimir Starkov Dr. Scott Thomas Flavia BainbridgeDr. Esther Bruegger Jennifer Cascone Fauver Dr. Ludwig ChincariniDrew Claxton Jennifer Fish Bastian GottschlingDr. Alan Grant Dr. Alex GrecuTimothy McKenna Dr. Jordan Milev Amparo Nieto Dr. Juan Carlos Ortigas Dr. Pedro Posada Yuko Saito Marco SchönbornSumit SharmaSvetlana Starykh Dr. Sugandha D. TuladharRaymund Wong Katie Cartwright Carina Chambarry Dr. Naoya KanekoDr. Noah KaufmanSukaina Klein Annie Lam Dr. William S. TaylorIvelina Velikova

RELATED PRACTICE AREAS:

RELATED PUBLICATIONS:
Snapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation: 2011 UpdateSnapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation

Snapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation: 2010 Update

By Lucy P. Allen and Mary Elizabeth Stern

Over the past few years, the asbestos litigation environment has undergone many changes, including legislative and judicial tort reform, judicial investigations into the quality of supporting medical evidence, and a heightened scrutiny of the documentation accepted by several larger asbestos trusts. In this second annual review of recent trends in filings and settlements in asbestos litigation, NERA Senior Vice President Lucy P. Allen and Vice President Mary Elizabeth C. Stern extend their analysis to review asbestos-related claims during the period 2001 through 2009 for over 150 solvent defendants who report claims in their public filings.

In this report, the authors find that aggregate trends continue to be generally favorable to asbestos defendants, and that there were few substantial changes in the asbestos litigation environment in 2009. Over the past year, asbestos claim filings have continued to decline; average aggregate indemnity payments rose, but remained below earlier spikes; the number of resolved claims stayed constant; dismissal rates pulled back some, but continued at high levels; pending claims dropped to their lowest level since 2001; and average dollars per resolved claim increased, but remained below prior spikes.