Home > Publications > Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Filings Plummet,...

NERA PUBLICATIONS




Download >

RELATED PRACTICE AREAS:
Securities and Finance

Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Filings Plummet, Settlements Soar

2 January 2007
By Dr. Ronald I. Miller and Dr. Stephanie Plancich et al.

Despite a surge in lawsuits alleging options backdating, shareholder class action filings were down dramatically in 2006, even as settlements of existing cases soared past last year's record levels, according to this newly released edition of NERA's semi-annual study. The authors find that average class action settlements paid by corporations to shareholder plaintiffs rose by 37% in 2006 -- an increase driven by "mega-settlements" exceeding $100 million. Four multi-billion-dollar settlements occurred in 2006, in addition to the partial settlement of $7.1 billion paid to shareholder plaintiffs in the Enron class action, which began in 2005 and continued into 2006. The largest payout to date in a shareholder class action, the Enron settlement is expected to grow even larger after the final payments are made to shareholders.

The study also notes that, despite 22 lawsuits over the issue of options backdating, shareholder class action filings plunged 36% during 2006 (based on filings through 15 December). This decline in filings continues a trend that began in the second half of 2005, and represents a 44% decline from the average rate of filings after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA), passed in 1995 to curtail excessive securities litigation. According to NERA, only 129 federal shareholder class actions were filed from 1 January through 15 December 2006. A total of 135 are expected by year's end -- in contrast with 211 filings in 2005.

The study's key findings also include:


The authors note that other factors helping to determine the size of settlements are the class of securities involved (bonds and options boost the size of settlement values), the depth of defendant's pockets, and whether accounting improprieties are suspected. Their analysis also indicates that if an IPO is involved, settlements increase by approximately one-third.