White Collar, Investigations and Enforcement

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

Regulatory enforcement is on the rise, and the DOJ and SEC are expected to remain aggressive in enforcing the FCPA in the future. But one fundamental economic issue in FCPA disputes has so far garnered little attention: if a company pays a bribe to secure a project, what exactly is the gain to the company from the bribe?

During the penalty phase of an enforcement action, the amount of fines (including disgorgement) levied are based on the "benefit received" from a bribe. However, to date there has been little consideration of the true benefit of the bribe. With fines escalating into the hundreds of millions of dollars, it is necessary to clearly understand what effect a bribe had on profits and to carefully establish what the but-for profits would have been without the bribe. Rigorous economic analysis sheds light on how to evaluate the effect of a bribe and what the appropriate fines, if any, should be.

The true benefit of a bribe is not based only on the profits earned from the project; there are a number of additional considerations based on the incremental probability of winning generated by the bribe, and the opportunity cost of the project won, that will lead to a more realistic (and sometimes lower) calculation of the true economic profits from the bribe. For example, while a bribe may have led to very high gains, the but-for profits could have been high (and the gain from the bribe low) if the bribe would have little effect on the probability of winning the work or if alternative projects were similarly profitable.

NERA experts can help in FCPA matters by using economic analysis to apply great precision to the financial benefits of bribery in order to evaluate the effect of the bribe, and therefore the appropriate fines. We offer a global team of experts in economics, finance, and accounting; many of NERA's economists are also Certified Public Accountants and Chartered Financial Analysts, with training and experience in analyzing financial statements and financial data prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and International Financial Reporting Standards.

Name Title Location Phone Email
Dr. Patrick Conroy Managing Director
Chair of NERA's Securities and Finance Practice
New York City +1 212 345 1466 patrick.conroy@nera.com
Dr. Graeme Hunter Managing Director New York City +1 212 345 7724 graeme.hunter@nera.com
Dr. Vinita Juneja Managing Director
Chair of NERA's White Collar, Investigations and Enforcement Practice
New York City
London
Toronto
+1 212 345 3148
+44 20 7659 8618
+1 416 868 7314
vinita.juneja@nera.com
Ivelina Velikova Senior Consultant New York City +1 212 345 1160 ivelina.velikova@nera.com
Title Type Author
Expert Analysis: Financial Crisis Anniversary - Trends In Credit Crisis Settlements Published Article By Faten Sabry, Sungi Lee, and Linh Nguyen
Securities Class Actions: 2016 Full-Year Review and Mid-2017 Flash Update Published Article By Stefan Boettrich and Svetlana Starykh
BSA/AML Compliance and Enforcement: An Update for the Securities and Derivatives Indu... Published Article By. Sharon Brown-Hruska
Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2016 Update Report By Bradley A. Heys & Robert Patton
Finding the GAAP in FCPA Enforcement: Challenges in Identifying the Impact of Alleged... Working Paper By Raymund Wong and Dr. Jerry Arnold
Economic Analysis of Damages under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Working Paper By Dr. Patrick Conroy and Dr. Graeme Hunter
FCPA Settlements: It's a Small World After All Working Paper By Raymund Wong and Dr. Patrick Conroy