NERA Economic Consulting

Home About NERA Practice Areas Publications pressroom careers  

Study

14 February 2005

E-mail this     Print page
Download study
Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Bear Market Cases Bring Big Settlements

By Dr. Elaine Buckberg, Todd Foster, Dr. Ronald Miller and Dr. Stephanie Plancich

NERA Economic Consulting's annual study of shareholder class action litigation reveals a new era of unprecedented settlements, with some of the nation's larger corporations making bigger-than-ever payments to shareholders in compensation for losses in the recent bear market. In a new trend, some of these companies are also instituting corporate governance reforms as part of their settlements.

The report, titled "Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Bear Market Cases Bring Big Settlements" and authored by NERA Senior Vice President Dr. Elaine Buckberg, Vice Presidents Todd Foster and Dr. Ronald Miller, and Senior Consultant Dr. Stephanie Plancich, is based on a NERA study of securities class action filings, settlements and investor losses in 2004.

The authors found that securities class action filings against WorldCom, Raytheon and Bristol-Myers Squibb produced three of the eight largest class action settlements of all time -- with a combined value of over $3.3 billion, more than twice the combined value of the largest settlements of 2003 made by Lucent Technologies, Rite Aid, DaimlerChrysler and Oxford Health Plan.

According to NERA, these top-ranking settlements contributed to a 33% increase in mean settlement value to $27.1 million in 2004, up from $20.3 million in 2003. Of the 119 settlements made last year, nine were valued at $100 million or more; 16 settlements exceeded $50 million (including SEC settlements). Fueling the trend, according to the report, are payouts to investors battered in the recent bear market. Investor losses ballooned from $140 million in the average suit settling in 1996 to $2.5 billion in 2003 before dropping to $1.7 billion in 2004.

Meanwhile, the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act (SOX) was found to have no statistically significant effect on settlement values. According to the authors, the real impact of SOX on shareholder class actions appears to have been on the trend toward incorporating corporate governance reforms into settlements. Since the passage of that legislation, at least nine settlements have incorporated such reforms, including cases involving AON Corporation, HCA Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company, among others.


E-mail this           Print page
 Download study
Dr. Elaine Buckberg
Todd Foster
Dr. Ron Miller
Dr. Stephanie Plancich
D&O Liability and Insurance 2005

New York, NY

9 June 2005
A D&O Insurance Perspective on Defending and Resolving Securities Litigation

New York City, NY

2 February 2005
Concern Grows Over Exposure to US Lawsuits

Financial Times

30 May 2005

The Rise of Shareholder Class Actions in Australia

Mondaq News

21 April 2005

Legal Reform Turns a Steward Into an Activist

The New York Times

16 April 2005

Study of Shareholder Class Action Litigation Finds Unprecedented Settlement Values in 2004, with Some Plaintiffs Also Winning Corporate Reforms

Directors & Boards

1 March 2005

The Rise (or Fall) of Class Action Costs

CFO.com

15 February 2005

Study: Class Action Settlements Reach Record Level in 2004

WebCPA

15 February 2005

Securities Class Action Settlement Amounts Rise

Business Insurance

14 February 2005

Big Settlements in 2004 Follow Big Losses in the Bear Market

Press Release

14 February 2005

Securities Class-Action Settlement Sums Reach a Record

The New York Times

14 February 2005

 
©1996-2010 National Economic Research Associates, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Privacy policy | Site map | Experts | Contact us