For the best experience we recommend upgrading to the latest version of these supported browsers:
I wish to continue viewing on my unsupported browser
For the best experience we recommend upgrading to the latest version of these supported browsers:
I wish to continue viewing on my unsupported browser
04 June 2015
Mary Elizabeth C. Stern and Lucy P. Allen
In their annual review of recent trends in filings and settlements in asbestos litigation, NERA Vice President Mary Elizabeth C. Stern and Senior Vice President Lucy P. Allen use publicly available data to analyze trends in asbestos-related liabilities for more than 150 companies. Incorporating the 2014 data, the authors observed that:
Together these trends point to a period of relative stability in the asbestos litigation environment, as filings, average dollars, and total indemnity spending remain steady. Falling defense costs may also be a reflection of this stability, as companies may need to spend less on developing legal strategies while continuing to manage existing litigation.
Going forward, however, the authors note that the impact of the 2014 decision in In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC on solvent defendants continues to be a source of uncertainty. While filing and settlement patterns were relatively unchanged in 2014, it may be too soon to assess the ultimate impact of Garlock, as defendants may not yet have access to data from the Trusts.